Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Graystone who wrote (7210)	12/13/1997 2:51:00 PM
From: Graystone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

If you can post then you really should learn how SI works. A good exaple of a longtime user who is unaware of how SI works is mark silvers, he seems to know what he is doing but it is obvious he doesn't. He thinks that I am posting to people out of the blue, should we tell him. heheheh. If you don't have posting rights you can't be blamed for not knowing how the links work, I think you have to be a member, anyone ? To: Bill Jackson (7093 ) Saturday, Dec 13 1997 1:29PM EST From: Graystone Reply # 7210 of 7214 Hi Bill What flavour is it ? This message appears mystically out of the thread to mark and he obviously doesn't know what it means. If you can see the number I have chosen to highlight, that is the message I am replying to. People with posting rights like mark could click on this number to see the original question or to follow the conversation. To: Graystone (6966 ) Thursday, Dec 11 1997 8:57PM EST From: Bill Jackson Reply # of 7215 Graystone, Do you recall the Monty Python skit, SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM, etc. Bill Many people don't like to run into clearly gray areas and so avoid my posts. heheheh. Once in awhile I will respond to my inbox, thats all. Sort of like a janitor, keeping things tidy, heheheh. If I want to get into conversations with the crew, I do, everybody knows that. I post to myself because it keeps the SPAM down, heheheh, and a benefit is readers can jump to a previous post of mine, heheheh. Gray Area Example ...This Circular requires approval from the ASE for any assay methodology used if other than a fire assay methodology. In addition, this regulation requires the issuing company to process all samples using both the non-standard assay methodology as well as the conventional fire assay methodology... ...Subsequent to the halt, AMCL attempted to duplicate Naxos' assay methodologywithout success... ...Naxos' assay methodology... ...Despite this statement and the positive results achieved at Ledoux and Company not only in the month of October 1996, but throughout 1997, the ASE never acknowledged nor approved Naxos' methodology... I must interject an observation here. A statement is made here three times, it is NAXOF's methodology* ...The first set of results are based on the completion of the first stage of a three stage, patent pending, metallurgical methodology developed by Johnson, Lett and Company... Do you think Johnson-Lett took years and years, and millions of shareholder dollars to develop thier process ?? Is $85,000,000.00 enough, don't they deserve more ??? When do we get our share of the Treasure. ???? heheheh, hey Why are they are getting it now ???