SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dermot Burke who wrote (14882)12/13/1997 3:01:00 PM
From: Gerald R. Lampton  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
Mandatory bedtime reading for all Micro-philes:

1. 5 CommLaw Conspectus 181 CommLaw Conspectus Summer, 1997 The State of the First Amendment at the Approach of the Millennium THE CONSTITUTION OF CODE: LIMITATIONS ON CHOICE--BASED CRITIQUES OF CYBERSPACE REGULATION Lawrence Lessig

2. 85 Geo. L.J. 1837 Georgetown Law Journal June, 1997 Response THE PUZZLING PERSISTENCE OF BELLBOTTOM THEORY: WHAT A CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY SHOULD BE Lawrence Lessig

3. 110 Harv. L. Rev. 1785 Harvard Law Review June, 1997 Commentary ERIE-EFFECTS OF VOLUME 110: AN ESSAY ON CONTEXT IN INTERPRETIVE THEORY Lawrence Lessig

4. 65 Fordham L. Rev. 1365 Fordham Law Review March 1997 FIDELITY AND CONSTRAINT Lawrence Lessig

5. 27 Cumb. L. Rev. 1 Cumberland Law Review 1996-1997 Cordell Hull Speaker Forum [FNa] CONSTITUTION AND CODE Lawrence Lessig

6. 45 Emory L.J. 869 Emory Law Journal Summer 1996 The Randolph W. Thrower Symposium READING THE CONSTITUTION IN CYBERSPACE Lawrence Lessig

7. 11 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 635 Saint John's Journal of Legal Commentary Summer 1996 Symposium INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND CODE Lawrence Lessig

8. 94 Mich. L. Rev. 1422 Michigan Law Review May, 1996 I. Courts and Constitution POST CONSTITUTIONALISM Constitutional Domains: Democracy, Community, Management. By Robert C. Post. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1995. pp. ix, 463. $45. Lawrence Lessig

9. 48 Stan. L. Rev. 1403 Stanford Law Review May, 1996 Symposium THE ZONES OF CYBERSPACE Lawrence Lessig

10. 144 U. Pa. L. Rev. 2181 University of Pennsylvania Law Review May, 1996 Symposium: Law, Economics, & Norms SOCIAL MEANING AND SOCIAL NORMS Lawrence Lessig [FNd1]

11. 74 Tex. L. Rev. 839 Texas Law Review March, 1996 Review Essay WHAT DRIVES DERIVABILITY: RESPONSES TO RESPONDING TO IMPERFECTION Responding to Imperfection: The Theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment. Edited by Sanford Levinson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995. Pp. 330. $59.50, Cloth; $18.95, Paper. Lawrence Lessig

12. 62 U. Chi. L. Rev. 943 University of Chicago Law Review Summer 1995 THE REGULATION OF SOCIAL MEANING Lawrence Lessig [FNd]

13. 104 Yale L.J. 1743 Yale Law Journal May, 1995 Symposium: Emerging Media Technology and the First Amendment THE PATH OF CYBERLAW Lawrence Lessig

14. 16 Cardozo L. Rev. 2249 Cardozo Law Review April, 1995 Contribution THE LIMITS OF LIEBER Lawrence Lessig

15. 47 Stan. L. Rev. 395 Stanford Law Review February, 1995 UNDERSTANDING CHANGED READINGS: FIDELITY AND THEORY Lawrence Lessig

16. 1995 Sup. Ct. Rev. 125 Supreme Court Review 1995 TRANSLATING FEDERALISM: UNITED STATES v. LOPEZ Lawrence Lessig

17. 43 DePaul L. Rev. 673 DePaul Law Review SPRING 1994 Report EVALUATION OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Chicago Council of Lawyers APPENDIX A By Professor Lawrence Lessig, University of Chicago Law School Preface

18. 94 Colum. L. Rev. 1 Columbia Law Review January, 1994 THE PRESIDENT AND THE ADMINISTRATION Lawrence Lessig Cass R. Sunstein

19. 15 Cardozo L. Rev. 175 Cardozo Law Review October, 1993 Executive Branch Interpretation of the Law READINGS BY OUR UNITARY EXECUTIVE Lawrence Lessig

20. 71 Tex. L. Rev. 1165 Texas Law Review May, 1993 FIDELITY IN TRANSLATION Lawrence Lessig

21. 98 Yale L.J. 1173 Yale Law Journal April, 1989 Note PLASTICS: UNGER AND ACKERMAN ON TRANSFORMATION Lawrence Lessig

I am going through these, and though sometimes repetitive, the guy actually does show some originality and depth of thought.

I throw in some "choice cuts" from time to time when what he has to say seems pertinent.



To: Dermot Burke who wrote (14882)12/13/1997 3:13:00 PM
From: John Donahoe  Respond to of 24154
 
RE: "The only fact is the bundling/integrating of the MSFT OS system windows and its successors NT incl. will not be allowed to continue in any form or guise."

Where did this "fact" come from? I can't seem locate it in either the DOJ's consent decree or Judge Penfield's ruling.

JD