Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Russell who wrote (25182)	12/13/1997 3:01:00 PM
From: DavidG	Respond to of 53903

Richard, >> What does all that mu bull s**T have to do with you calling for mu to be 40-50 by jan. or are you still sticking to that position? << I do not know what the situation that you are referring to but your last posting referred to two months ago I said 50 by JAN and now you are backpeddling to 40-50 by JAN. Soon you will say it was more than two months and some other number. Fundamentals change day to day and only a fool refuses to recognize this. The Korean debacle and its failed currencies and bank failures will upset the semi business for a while. This includes the likes of INTC, DELL, CPQ, TXN etc. So do I think MU will rise in the face of their falls...OF COURSE NOT... and for you to suggest I might just instigates this confrontation. Your incompetency is only surpassed by your ignorance!!! If you want to have a constructive dialog that is fine, if you want to joke around that is OK too, but if you want to misrepresent facts or make personal attacks on any one here who disagrees with your nonsense than so be it. Good Luck Trading DavidG

To: Richard Russell who wrote (25182)	12/13/1997 8:16:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53903

>>What does all that mu bull s*T have to do with you calling for mu to be 40-50 by jan.<< it was $50. oh, and NOTHING ;-) >>or are you still sticking to that position?<< hll NO! he's running faster from it than ben johnson on steroids... ;-) >>i have never said that mu will be in single digits(read my posts)<< richard, i said that mu would be closer (we do all understand what that means, right? ;-) to $6 than $50 by jan. oh, and the stock was in the $40s when i said it. I'M RIGHT - AGAIN. :-) >>i have always maintained that mu would see the teens by the end of the year.<< yes, you did. and you really piss those people off who were dead wrong b/c you were right. and i mean REALLY RIGHT. you have a stock in the $40s and $50s and saying that it will see the teens in a couple months takes GUTS. >>>well to put it politely ...you just have your heads up each others BUTTS!!!!!<<< dave, don't be mad at us for repeating what you said. you said jan. you said $50. not me. not "you guys." you've been watching politics far too long. those diversion tactics don't work with me and i'm sure richard is far too smart to fall for them. i see through them like i see through mu :-) btw, you're far too sensitive. there is nothing bad about giving it your best shot (even if your off by 35 points ;-). everyone is wrong in this game very often. just look at nfli ;-) it is tanking b/c the street thinks that the results are late. i already own half the d*mn company, or so it seems. i guess i'll have to buy the other half now. ;-) there is dishonor in not learning from the experience. jmho. good trading all. GRAVITY, DO YOUR THING, BABY :-)