Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (789150)	6/11/2014 11:47:53 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1576180

>> The only city of consequence on that list is Oakland which has a long history of financial problems and will continue to have them for the foreseeable future. San Jose has financial reserves but is experiencing a grown pension burden. The rest on your list are inconsequential. Fresno is inconsequential? Yes, it is not important. Its small farm city that is poor and corrupt. For as long as I was in CA, Fresno frequently had financial problems. The poorest cities in America Want to live among the wealthy? California or the Northeast is the place for you. Look to the South to find communities at the other end of the pay scale. money.msn.com > Your craziness scares me at times. As someone who actually understands finance talking to someone who doesn't, I can understand how you might think it sounds crazy. It is just impossible that liberal management has driven these cities into fiscal disasters, right? You and most Rs only understand finance when it furthers your ideology. Aren't you tired of being wrong most of the time?