SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (789744)6/13/2014 4:31:13 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575775
 
<<
True, and mercenaries from Pakistan, Afghanistan, Turkey, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia and parts unknown are certain to join the fray. All it took was for Obama to shirk his role in supporting a stable Iraq. It is what it is.>>

What planet do you live on? It was never stable and Maliki is hated.

Do you not understand Iraq is in bed with Iran now because of Bush?

How do you figure.?Bush did the deal to leave, not Obama. And Maliki turned down our help, so we left.

Maliki turned down our help because Iran didn't want American troops in Iraq!!!

They did not want us there. So what do you think we could have done. They asked us to leave.

And we had been there too long. Should never have been there to begin with.

Did you want us to stay another 10 or 20 years and spend another couple of trillion dollars on that stupid war?

Why did bush go in in the first place? We gained nothing from it. what do you think we gained by his dumb ass invasion?

85% of the ME is Sunni, only 15% is Shia. so this was a fait accompli from the beginning.

You make no sense at all.



To: one_less who wrote (789744)6/13/2014 5:12:27 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575775
 
when was Iraq "stable"?

Last time was when Saddam ruled….