SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alex MG who wrote (252939)6/16/2014 1:48:52 PM
From: Sam  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 540839
 
Kant's antinomies:
en.wikipedia.org



To: Alex MG who wrote (252939)6/16/2014 2:06:34 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 540839
 
Here is what I think.

<<
this is the most mind blowing thing to think about, time and space

where did time begin? but there had to be something before that... there couldn't just be nothingness and all of a sudden somethingness popped up>.

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle says that is exactly what can happen. Something out of nothing. we are just humans, so it is no wonder we cannot understand that.

Our universe is only a very tiny part of the whole of everything, I think. Universes probably explode all the time. The physics is beyond everyone. And some sort of infinity is also probably at play.

I am a believer in the multiverse which means every time one little thing changes another universe pers se pops up.

Our universe is only 13.7 billion years old. A number I can understand. Why not 20 zillion years old given the probability of infinity?

<<how can space have an ending point, there has to be something beyond that but how can it possibly go on forever but how can it not>>

I can do better on this one. Here is how, IMO, to think of our universes outer edge. Beyond that is nothing. Just nothing. As the universe expands it creates more space. It pushed out into nothingness. The pushing creates somethingness. Nothing to stop it as there is nothing there.

<it has to be a circular thing as opposed to linear >>

I think all of it just gets larger and has been doing that maybe forever.



To: Alex MG who wrote (252939)6/16/2014 2:37:53 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 540839
 
When you can do this, you will know the answer:



To: Alex MG who wrote (252939)6/16/2014 4:08:43 PM
From: Katelew  Respond to of 540839
 
"it has to be a circular thing as opposed to linear"

Time-space curvature ala Einstein and relativity theory??

But please don't post with a question because I've given you the sum total of my understanding of it! :)

Cosmology can make one's head explode.