SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (790425)6/17/2014 12:48:32 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
one_less

  Respond to of 1579731
 
Lost Lerner Emails Mirror Nixon's 18 1/2 Minute Gap



To: one_less who wrote (790425)6/17/2014 12:49:18 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
one_less

  Respond to of 1579731
 
Global Warming Witch Hunt Continues With Caleb Rossiter
.......................................................................................................................

06/16/2014

Without evidence to back up their claims, climate zealots have taken to intimidation.


They're blacklisting academics who have the nerve to question the "settled science" of climate change.

The latest victim of climate McCarthyism is Caleb Rossiter, who, until his op-ed challenging the "consensus" on climate change was published in the Wall Street Journal, was a Democratic academic who briefly forayed into politics but was content to crusade against U.S. support for dictators and against the use of anti-personnel land mines.

In that op-ed, Rossiter called himself an "Africanist." He not only questioned the science behind climate change warnings but the impact of abandoning fossil fuels on human progress on a continent that's lowest in production of carbon emissions and the neediest in terms of economic development.

For his questioning of climate orthodoxy, Rossiter, an adjunct professor at American University, was sacked via email from his position with the Institute for Policy Studies. That organization says it is committed to something called "climate justice," a notion that Rossiter questioned. He believes that position dooms the African continent to reliance on green energy sources such as wind and solar that are erratic and unreliable.

"If people ever say that fears of censorship for 'climate change' views are overblown, have them take a look at this: Just two days after I published a piece in the Wall Street Journal calling for Africa to be allowed the 'all of the above' energy strategy we have in the U.S., the Institute for Policy Studies terminated my 23-year relationship with them ... because my analysis and theirs 'diverge,'" Rossiter told Climate Depot.

Where's the justice, Rossiter asked in his piece "Sacrificing Africa For Climate Change," in "trying to deny to Africans the reliable electricity — and thus the economic development and extended years of life — that fossil fuels can bring"?

Even if the "wildest claims" of climate zealots are true, he writes, "Africa should be exempted from global restraints as it seeks to modernize."

Rossiter doesn't accept these claims, noting "the computer models simply built in the assumption that fossil fuels are the culprit when temperatures rise, even though a similar warming took place from 1900 to 1940, before fossil fuels could have caused it."

He also questions the logic behind imposing calamitous human suffering for improvements that are at best infinitesimal for global temperatures.

"Computer models used by the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to determine the cause of the six-tenths of one degree Fahrenheit rise in global temperature from 1980 to 2000 could not statistically separate fossil-fueled and natural trends," he writes.





news.investors.com



To: one_less who wrote (790425)6/17/2014 2:59:12 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1579731
 
Self protection is a natural right afforded by the human condition

Self protection, ie survival, is the most basic of human needs, it is not a right.