SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (791037)6/20/2014 9:15:30 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583713
 
Wanna bet?

Let's make a wager....

$1000 bucks says its get thrown out, dismissed or judgment for Walker like the last two demolib witchhunts....



To: koan who wrote (791037)6/20/2014 10:07:26 PM
From: i-node  Respond to of 1583713
 
>> Scott Walker is a criminal and the law is going to put his ass in jail where it belongs.

Yes, there are two kinds of people in life. Nutjob Democrats and criminals.



To: koan who wrote (791037)6/20/2014 10:28:00 PM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583713
 
Obama is a criminal and the law is going to put his ass in jail where it belongs.



To: koan who wrote (791037)6/20/2014 10:28:35 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1583713
 
Eric Holder is a criminal and the law is going to put his ass in jail where it belongs.



To: koan who wrote (791037)6/20/2014 10:29:04 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1583713
 
Lois Lerner is a criminal and the law is going to put her ass in jail where it belongs.



To: koan who wrote (791037)6/20/2014 10:29:36 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1583713
 
Charles Rangel is a criminal and the law is going to put his ass in jail where it belongs.



To: koan who wrote (791037)6/21/2014 12:39:27 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583713
 
How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks to Succeed

Jason Riley has a message for Bill de Blasio. It’s the blunt title of his new book: “Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks to Succeed.”

But it’s not only Park Slope progressives Riley has in mind.

“One lesson of the Obama presidency — maybe the most important one for blacks — is that having a black man in the Oval Office is less important than having one in the home.”

Just one of Riley’s many tart observations about the folly of believing politicians have the answers for what ails black America.

Now, Jason is a friend and former colleague whose wife, Naomi, writes for these pages. He is an affable Wall Street Journal editorialist who came to his views as a college student reading writers such as George Will and Charles Krauthammer in the otherwise liberal Buffalo News.

Over breakfast at a Sixth Avenue café, Riley explains that the conservative columnists seemed to him to have the better case.

Through them he was introduced to economist Tom Sowell and historian Shelby Steele, black thinkers who rejected the liberal pieties about race. Once he got a taste, he says, “it was off to the races.”

Riley’s fundamental question is this: “At what point does helping start hurting?” And it comes at a timely moment in our history, 50 years after the War on Poverty and with our first black president now in his second term.

And it has a special urgency for New York City, where our new mayor sees himself in the vanguard of a resurgent progressivism that Riley regards as deadly to the aspirations of black New Yorkers.

Take the minimum wage. At all levels of government today — federal, state, city — politicians are competing with one another to see who can raise it highest. Even Republicans such as Mitt Romney say it should be raised.

Few seem aware of its ugly past. Down Under, for example, minimum-wage laws were part of the “White Australia” policy that aimed to keep Chinese from competing with white Australians. Likewise in apartheid-era South Africa, where minimum wages were meant to price out blacks.

Though never as far-reaching, we had the same dynamic in the United States, a major reason why black leaders from Booker T. Washington to W.E.B. Du Bois regarded trade unions as the enemy of the black man.

In a telling nugget, Riley quotes then-Sen. John F. Kennedy, explaining at a 1957 hearing in Congress why he supported raising the federal minimum wage:

“Having on the market a rather large source of cheap labor depresses wages outside of that group, too — the white worker who has to compete. And when an employer can substitute a colored worker at a lower wage . . . it affects the whole wage structure of the area, doesn’t it?”

Riley notes that minimum-wage hikes today aren’t meant to keep blacks from competing with whites. Nevertheless, it’s still the effect.

“Up to the 1930s,” Riley says, “black Americans had a lower unemployment rate than white Americans. Up to the 1950s, the unemployment rates were roughly the same. But for the last five decades, black unemployment has been roughly double the white rate.

“And the turning point,” he says, “was in the 1930s, when Congress passed minimum-wage laws.”

He’s similarly scathing about those who tout the minimum wage as an antidote to poverty. “For most black households,” he says, “the problem isn’t a worker not earning enough. The problem is no one in the household has a job.”

But if the evidence is so clear, why does black America overwhelmingly vote for the pols who push the policies Riley finds so destructive? He puts down his coffee and gives two reasons.

One, he says, is a culture where many African-Americans look to government for jobs, whether in a public school or a post office. Riley cites an uncle who told him, “When I hear Republicans talking about ‘small government,’ I think, ‘That’s anti-black.’ ”

The other is a GOP that doesn’t do much to try to persuade them otherwise. He points out there’s now a huge Republican debate about how to take its message to Latinos. “Where’s the same outreach for black America?” he asks.

In making his arguments, Riley marshals a mountain of compelling statistics. But in the end, this book isn’t about numbers. It’s about the high human toll good intentions have inflicted on people least able to afford them.

“The left’s sentimental support,” writes Riley, “has turned underprivileged blacks into playthings for liberal intellectuals and politicians who care more about clearing their conscience or winning votes than advocating behaviors and attitudes that have allowed other groups to get ahead.”

Maybe someone ought to send a copy up to Gracie Mansion.

http://nypost.com/2014/06/20/the-life-of-riley-he-doesnt-want-your-help/

http://www.amazon.com/Please-Stop-Helping-Us-Liberals/dp/1594037256/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1403364717&sr=8-1&keywords=jason+riley



To: koan who wrote (791037)6/21/2014 12:40:14 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1583713
 
... two judges have already ruled that John Doe prosecutors have absolutely no evidence of wrongdoing.

U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Randa, who last month shut down the investigation through a preliminary injunction, described the prosecutors’ claims against Walker as “simply wrong.”

“The prosecutors’ coordination conspiracy is the conspiracy to do things that are not only legal, but are absolutely protected by the U.S. Constitution,” said a legal expert with knowledge of the lawsuits.

......

Fascistic liberals aching to go fullbore Stalinist.



To: koan who wrote (791037)6/21/2014 3:18:18 PM
From: Joe Btfsplk4 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
i-node
jlallen
steve harris

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583713
 
Scott Walker is a criminal and the law is going to put his ass in jail where it belongs

koan, your kind are a life form not unlike cholera that exists for similar reasons.

The desire to punish those who represent a belief in freedom is inherent in your vile ideology. I'm sure you'd find delight in seeing the heads of those who subscribe to true liberalism scattered about hither and yon.

Be careful what you wish for. This may yet be settled with the blood of patriots and tyrants.



To: koan who wrote (791037)6/21/2014 6:36:53 PM
From: Joe Btfsplk1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1583713
 
Frightening how many gerbils just can't understand understand facts.

Hillary vs. Walker: Due Process Only Applies If You’re A Liberal

Child rapists deserve due process. Conservatives governors, not so much.

Two unfolding stories offer us a revealing glimpse into the extraordinarily malleable morality of the left.

There is the case of Hillary Clinton’s 1975 defense of a child rapist in Arkansas. As you know, defending your client to the best of your ability is what the law demands. And the law is the law. Then there is the case of governor Wisconsin Scott Walker, someone who, though he has never been close to being found guilty (or even formally charged) of any crime, is guilty of wrongdoing by the mere existence of an accusation. Here, the law is irrelevant.

Clinton. Champion of women, slayer of conspiracies, and a woman who as a lawyer once went hard at a 12-year-old rape victim in Arkansas was simply providing an invaluable constitutional service. It was her job.

In the Daily Beast, the now 52-year-old victim says that “Hillary Clinton took me through Hell” — a line that would surely eradicate the political aspirations of any Republican candidate. Man or woman. Of course, the case against Clinton is not a question of whether the accused deserves a competent defense – this, we hope is settled. What it should focus on is whether Clinton deployed some of that unbridled ambition to unethically denigrate and lie about a 12-year-old who was raped.

Here is a snippet from a Glenn Thrush story from 2008 that touches on the matter, gently:

The case offers a glimpse into the way Clinton deals with crisis. Her approach, then and now, was to immerse herself in even unpleasant tasks with a will to win, an attitude captured in one of her favorite aphorisms: “Bloom where you’re planted.”

Ah, bloom where you’re planted. According to the Daily Beast, the victim asserts that Hillary “smeared her and used dishonest tactics to successfully get her attacker off with a light sentence” — even though, she claims, Clinton knew he was guilty. According to Hillary, the 12-year-old was “emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing.” And maybe this was true, maybe not. But it’s long been procedure in campaigns to rummage through the cases of candidates who are former prosecutors and defense lawyers to dredge up unsavory cases. Democrats often go after former Attorneys General for failing to prosecute rapes cases at a rate to their liking, so this seems fair game. The rape story is not about the law, which can all agree is sacrosanct.
Sometimes.

I’m no Frank Luntz, but it seems like two words you don’t want attached to you are “criminal” and “scheme” t.co

— Jonathan Chait (@jonathanchait) June 20, 2014

Scott Walker, on the other hand, is culpable even if he functioned within the law. Probably because his views are offensive, because anyone who has an email discussion with Karl Rove or a phone conversation with the Koch Brothers is, by default, guilty of crimes against democracy.

As Gabriel Malor explains in detail, the Walker investigation — driven by partisans — is basically dead despite a two-year long secret probe that was unable to make a case worthy of prosecution. Some prosecutor said “criminal scheme” so it’s over.

If that were the case, the Clintons would never have been able to rent out the White House. The reporting on the matter was entirely predictable. Outlets continue to use the present tense to explain the investigation. For the most egregious examples read the Washington Post, New York Times and Jonathan Chait — who mentions the existence of “Republican-appointed judges” three times in one post, but never the partisan nature of the prosecutors. Of course, all of this is meant to cloud the prospects of perhaps the strongest presidential contender available to Republicans. Job done.

But to recap: Child rapists deserve due process. Conservatives governors, not so much.

Follow David Harsanyi on Twitter.




To: koan who wrote (791037)6/29/2014 6:47:45 PM
From: Joe Btfsplk7 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
gamesmistress
i-node
lightshipsailor
THE WATSONYOUTH

and 2 more members

  Respond to of 1583713
 
Scott Walker is a criminal and the law is going to put his ass in jail where it belongs

Last week I wrote about the way the liberal mainstream media was trumpeting the rather slender evidence that Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker was in trouble over campaign fundraising. But yesterday, the story collapsed when the prosecutor cited in the original story denied the governor was in any legal peril. Predictably, the same outlets that promoted the first story are now burying the sequel.

The original accusations that Walker was at the center of an investigation of a criminal probe of violations of Wisconsin’s arcane campaign finance laws was treated as a very big deal by liberal outlets hungry for material to use to discredit the governor. The words “criminal scheme” to describe his actions echoed around the Internet and liberal shows on MSNBC and CNN. As I noted then, the New York Times had the story at the top of its home page when it broke and then plastered it on the front page of their print edition the next day. In the original version of the piece, the paper discussed the allegations in detail but only mentioned the fact that two separate judges—one state and one federal—had already dismissed the charges and halted the investigation in the case.

But the flimsy nature of the story didn’t stop most liberal print and broadcast outlets from treating this as proof that Walker had been discredited as a national political figure. The actions that were alleged to be illegal are, in fact, legal just about everywhere but Wisconsin. Moreover, a Walker email discussing one of his campaign consultants that had been made public was widely discussed as somehow an admission of guilt on the governor’s part even though it was nothing of the kind. While most of those who wrote about the case admitted that it was doubtful that Walker would ever be charged with anything, they gleefully noted that, as TIME’s Michael Scherer wrote, “from a distance” it would look bad.

Walker’s Democratic opponent in his reelection race this year certainly thought so. Mary Burke has already been airing commercials highlighting the accusations in the hope that the charge would turn the tide in what was already a close contest.

But yesterday those counting on this so-called scandal putting an end to Walker’s career got some disappointing news. The lawyer representing the special prosecutors that had been running the now curtailed investigation announced that, despite the misleading headlines, the governor was not the object of any criminal probe. Despite the broad conclusions drawn from the documents uncovered last week, the lawyer said that “no conclusions” had been reached in the effort that has already been dismissed by judges as a politicized fishing expedition.

But don’t expect any apologies from the liberals who were burying Walker and speaking of him as a criminal. Needless to say, the same outlets that were screaming bloody murder about Walker’s guilt last week haven’t much to say about this development. The Times buried a story about it inside the paper in contrast to the front-page treatment it accorded the original allegation.

This case was just the latest example of liberal attempts to take out a man whom they fear. Walker was the most successful of all the Republican governors elected in 2010. He achieved groundbreaking reforms that freed his state of the tyranny of state worker unions and their contracts that were burying Wisconsin (and many other states) in debt. That put him in the cross hairs of Democrats and their thuggish union allies that employed intimidation tactics to thwart the state legislature’s ability to function. When that failed they attempted to use a recall vote to throw Walker out of office that was no more successful than earlier efforts.

Liberal hate transformed Walker from a little known county executive four years ago into a conservative folk hero with a legitimate shot at a 2016 presidential run. Thus it was hardly surprising that many of the same people who have been denouncing his reformist policies were quick to seize on anything that would besmirch his reputation. But while liberals had high hopes for this story a week ago, it seems now they can only console themselves with the thought that the endless repetition of the word “criminal” in the same sentence with Walker’s name will have done enough damage to even the odds in the Wisconsin gubernatorial race. It remains to be seen whether the debunking of this “scandal” will undo the harm that the initial reports caused.

Like previous efforts to knock off Walker, this story flopped. Though he’s in for a tough fight to win reelection, liberals have been writing his political obituary almost continuously since he first took office in 2011. It may be that by overreaching in this manner, the left has once again handed Walker a stick with which to beat them. Just as the recall effort drew more attention to the dictatorial hold on the state treasury that unions were seeking to defend than any of Walker’s shortcomings, it may be that this “scandal” may have just served as a reminder to voters of media bias rather than any fault on the part of the governor.




To: koan who wrote (791037)6/29/2014 9:10:34 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1583713
 
Barack Obama is a criminal and the law is going to put his ass in jail where it belongs.



To: koan who wrote (791037)6/29/2014 9:10:56 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1583713
 
Eric Holder is a criminal and the law is going to put his ass in jail where it belongs.



To: koan who wrote (791037)6/29/2014 9:11:28 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1583713
 
Lois Lerner is a criminal and the law is going to put her ass in jail where it belongs.