Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas J Engelsma who wrote (7276)	12/13/1997 9:26:00 PM
From: Nanny	Respond to of 11098

<<<(Can't believe I just defended you Paul -- tis the season)>>> Tom, O Holy Night was playing on TV as I was reading this post.....eerie! Maybe it will inspire Paul to respond and acknowledge your defense as to its correctness so that I may respond to the two nice ladies that expressed concern. May we all remember the reason for the season! Nanny

To: Thomas J Engelsma who wrote (7276)	12/13/1997 10:01:00 PM
From: Momo Dog	Respond to of 11098

FWIW, Tom, I'm with you. Even a cursory reading of Paul's post in question shows that he was using an analogy and not saying or even implying that anyone employed by prst resigned in order to avoid being fired. Of course, it is true that some people read this forum and may or may not have their investment decisions influenced by what they read. I seem to remember several Bulls making that claim just prior to the filing of lawsuits by prst vs. Ivan, etc. If memory serves, the price of prst has declined since that time and it makes one wonder just how much the posts on this forum do in fact sway an investor's decision making. I personally have absolutely no idea as to who ternminated whom re: H'berg vs. prst, but it does seem abundantly clear that this was what Paul was referring to in his post.