Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sh who wrote (7228)	12/14/1997 12:12:00 AM
From: ShoppinTheNet	Respond to of 20681

SH your post was very good. You asked some very good questions and made some well thought out points. Thanks for your efforts.

To: sh who wrote (7228)	12/14/1997 12:54:00 AM
From: knight	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20681

sh, I'd guess that Ledoux are mostly concerned with contamination of the sample preparation procedure and the assay procedure itself. Note the following from the Dec.11/97 nr: During the month of November, Dr Al Johnson and one of his assistants spent two weeks at the Ledoux & Co laboratory providing additional instructional guidance to the Ledoux staff. They addressed and corrected certain aspects of the preparatory process as well as the assaying procedure That last sentance concerns me. Just what corrective action was taken to the preparation of the sample and the assay procedure? Whatever it was, the Ledoux staff were not familiar with this technique and had to be instructed in how to carry it out. Contamination does not have to be deliberate but could be caused by the new preparation process. I don't blame Ledoux for being cautious at this point. Their reputation is on the line. Just my opinion of course. knight