Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: joseffy who wrote (792590)	6/30/2014 10:19:47 AM
From: FJB	1 Recommendation Recommended By joseffy Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577905

Justice Kennedy's concurring opinion says that the government could pay for the coverage itself, so that women receive it. by tgoldstein 9:18 AM Comment Permalink The Court says that the government has failed to show that the mandate is the least restrictive means of advancing its interest in guaranteeing cost-free access to birth control. by Amy Howe 9:17 AM Comment RFRA applies to regulations that govern the activities of closely held for-profit corporations like Conestoga, HL and Mardel. by Amy Howe 9:17 AM Comment Closely held corporations cannot be required to provide contraception coverage. by tgoldstein 9:17 AM Comment Here is Hobby Lobby. by Amy Howe 9:16 AM Comment - See more at: live.scotusblog.com