Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (792711)	7/2/2014 9:48:10 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1585494

There is no reason their corporations shouldn't be allowed to maintain their religious views. How can a corporation have religious views? There is no reason why the reasoning used in this case cannot be extended to other things. Especially when it rests on specious grounds, namely their claim that it cannot be used to forbid covering of vaccinations because that is a public health issue. By extension, that means that contraception is not a public health issue when it clearly is. This is yet another example of the buffet approach to the law the activist Roberts court has made famous. Ends justify the means, right?