SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Taro who wrote (792776)7/1/2014 9:23:17 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1587546
 
Supreme Court rejects appeal by Google over Street View data collection
L.A. Times ^ | 06/30/14 | Andrea Chang


e U.S. Supreme Court has decided not to hear an appeal by Google over whether it violated federal wiretapping law when its Street View mapping cars collected consumers' personal data.

That leaves intact a federal appeals court ruling that the U.S. Wiretap Act protects the privacy of information on unencrypted in-home Wi-Fi networks and means Google can face lawsuits over the matter, according to a Bloomberg report.

The issue stems from Google's Street View, a comprehensive mapping program that provides images of areas around the world. Google has admitted that its camera-equipped Street View cars inadvertently captured emails, passwords and other data from unprotected wireless networks as they drove by.

In a statement, a Google spokesman said the Mountain View, Calif., company was disappointed that the Supreme Court had declined to hear the case.

In March 2013, Google agreed to pay a $7-million fine for collecting personal data from millions of unsecured wireless networks while operating its Street View fleet. The fine settled an investigation of the data collection by 38 states and the District of Columbia.

As part of that agreement, Google promised to educate employees about the privacy of consumer data and sponsor a public service campaign to teach people how to secure their wireless networks. Google also agreed to destroy the data it collected.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...



To: Taro who wrote (792776)7/1/2014 11:19:24 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1587546
 
Obama’s Out-of-Touch Energy Priorities: Long Hot Summer Means Brownouts and Rising Energy Prices



To: Taro who wrote (792776)7/2/2014 7:29:17 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1587546
 
Can't we just neuter them?

Why so?

Why not?

Or does this mean that you may have something against free and late abortions?


Why don't you tell me where you stand on the issue?