Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jack of All Trades who wrote (254623)	7/1/2014 12:43:12 PM
From: Metacomet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 540554

Sorry Jack, it's you that has no idea of what you are talking about.. What also is unclear is how many forms of contraception would exempt from being covered under Obamacare. The court cited four methods out of 20 to which Hobby Lobby and Conestoga objected — contending they were essentially abortions by preventing fertilized embryos from implanting in the womb. But it is unclear if other forms of contraception would be excluded from coverage on an employers’ religious grounds.

To: Jack of All Trades who wrote (254623)	7/1/2014 12:48:28 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 540554

"I'm sure you could come up with the $25/mth to pay for them out of your pocket." Why should she have to? She already has to subsidize your viagra coverage. Has it come to this, that American exceptionalism means being the only developed country in the world forced to talk about out-of-pocket medical expenses?

To: Jack of All Trades who wrote (254623)	7/1/2014 1:40:49 PM
From: bentway	Respond to of 540554

I think the actual Hobby Lobby decision will affect few, if any, employees. It's the unintended consequences that may bite us on the ass. Such as the decision a century ago that decided corporations have the rights of people.