Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Manmade Global Warming, A hoax? A Scam? or a Doomsday Cult? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Hurst who wrote (4058)	7/1/2014 3:00:06 PM
From: weatherguru	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4326

Do you know the difference between 300 ppm and 400 ppm? One one hundredth of one percent. That's literally the difference in water vapor between a dew point of -24F and -22F at standard temperature and pressure. In the computation you reference (illustrated below), what I love are the gray areas. They don't count that in the average. It's mostly sea ice. Too bad, since global sea ice is +1 standard deviation above the 30-year average. NOAA fudges data. We know that. Those stories have been presented on this board. Consider the temperature of all of Australia and the Pacific Ocean and other remote areas of the Earth from the late 1880's. Weather models, albeit extremely helpful, can't forecast beyond 5 days. And if we can recreate the past so well, why can't we forecast impending El Nino's within 3 months?