Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bread Upon The Water who wrote (254723)	7/1/2014 10:54:12 PM
From: Metacomet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541957

Got it.. It's ok to selectively violate the founding premises, long as the screwees are of a sufficiently insignificant class so that we can wink at that all men created equal, liberal crap...

To: Bread Upon The Water who wrote (254723)

7/2/2014 12:47:29 AM

From: koan

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541957

I know this much--only very small "non-public" type of corporations (the legal term is "Closed"-- with possibly no more than 5 shareholders) fall under the protection of the Religious Freedom Act (sayth the Justices) so you don't have to worry about GE and such changing its health benefits.

And if the government has an alternative way to get the benefits to the women working for them (through a 3rd party insurer instead of the owners) i don't understand what all the Sturm and Drang is about (in general--not you specifically).>.

I saw where 90% of the corporations fall under that criteria.