SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (793391)7/4/2014 11:24:32 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575761
 
Ted, with numbers like what you just posted, it's a wonder why Obama is even considered to be "Worst President Ever" by so many people these days.

What does Obama ass-kisser Steve Benen have to say about that? I wouldn't be surprised if he's trying to ignore the news ...


LOL. Actually the news is very good, o brilliant one. This country is on track for its best job growth since the Clinton years. In case you haven't noticed that observation skips right over all 8 of the Bush years. You see..........despite the fact Bush started two senseless wars, and that economies usually do well during wartime, economic growth during the Bush years was anemic at best and that was before he threw us into the worst recession since the Great Depression. Bush fucked us.........badly.

Its the great sense of entitlement coupled with excessive arrogance that keeps you all from seeing what empty suits Bush and his cronies were. And you are so detached from reality and so partisan, you all don't recognize how much better Obama is as a president. So sorry.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (793391)7/4/2014 11:26:52 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1575761
 
* I often wonder how strong the jubilation would be if economic conditions improved this much under a Romney administration: "The stock market, continuing a remarkable ascent that began in the darkness of the last recession, surged past a milestone on Thursday after a strong jobs report indicated that the economy might finally be gaining steam."



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (793391)7/4/2014 12:00:37 PM
From: tejek1 Recommendation

Recommended By
bentway

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575761
 
Obama nails it on why we need to invest in America's infrastructure—and why it's not happening

by Laura Clawson


attribution: Pete Souza/White House

President Barack Obama views the new bridge under construction adjacent to the Tappan Zee Bridge.

President Obama continues to press on the need to invest in infrastructure. Asked by Kai Ryssdal of Marketplace "we sit here in an economy where corporate profits are up, but the money's not being spent, where the jobs that are being created are low-wage, low-skill jobs. How's that supposed to work? How do you reconcile the disconnect there," Obama said:
Well, there's some things we could be doing right now that would make a huge difference. When I was at that bridge in Georgetown, Washington, D.C., yesterday, we were talking about the fact that we've got $2 trillion of deferred maintenance: roads, bridges, an air-traffic control system that's creaky, an electrical grid that wastes too much energy and is highly inefficient, and we could be putting hundreds of thousands of folks back to work right now and not only put a big boost to the economy in the short term, but also lay the foundation for economic competitiveness in the long term. That creates a lot of middle-class jobs. The challenge we have is not that we don't know what to do. The problem is that we've got a Congress right now that's been saying no to proposals that would make a difference.
That's an excellent summation of how ridiculous it is that Republicans are blocking infrastructure spending: 1) Our bridges, air-traffic control system, and electrical grid are not good enough for our needs right now.

2) Repairing and updating them would create hundreds of thousands of jobs, which would in turn boost the economy.

3) We need better infrastructure to be competitive in the future.

But no. Screw all that, Republicans need to oppose the president in all things and keep corporate taxes low at all costs.