Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: go4it who wrote (29244)	12/14/1997 11:48:00 AM
From: Bear Down	Respond to of 35569

1) Why are you negative on a stock that you have very little or no information on ? I have enough information to be negative in my opinion. I think the performance of this stock speaks for itself. 2)It is obvious to me that you don't have any negative information on this stock because I am sure you would use this forum to share it with us good people. Wouldn't you? Yes I would. All I have is my opinion based on what I have seen transpire here and my knowledge and experience in the jr. mining market. 3)Why is the management trying to proceed with such a useless project? Good question. One thing you might think about is who are all the people recieving the mooney that has been used so far from the IPM treasury. How much did IPM spend in 1997???? who recieved it???? 4) Why is a non-mining professional such as yourself so convinced that this project will never get off the ground ? money, hype, economical feasibility, hype, money hype and a realization of what the jr. mining markets are all about. Everything I express is my opinion based on the few facts that are available. Not the hype, just the facts. Fact. IPM burns money. fact. IPM has very little money.