SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (793414)7/3/2014 8:02:08 PM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575908
 
If liberals ever called their positions "beliefs," they would never be able to force them upon others. Instead, they have to call their positions "fact," or "truth," or "scientific consensus."


I suppose that is correct, but it isn't a big reach, to saying something synonymous like "I am convinced of this truth" and equivocating that with a "belief" statement.

They slip sometimes. I see Koan criticising right wingers for not believing in science or evolution, and I see him do it often, and comparing the "truth" of science against the mysticism of religion. Maybe he is an exception though, I haven't paid that much attention.

I will bow to your statement as the prevailing convention until I actually see some significant evidence to substantiate my worries.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (793414)7/4/2014 7:15:58 AM
From: Taro1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575908
 
Atheism is based on the FACT, that there is no God - 'because 97% of the scientists say so', right?

Until it has been PROVEN beyond all doubt, that there is no God, the Atheism is but another religion, with many believers, some of them almost as fanatic as those of the religion of peace (the only one).
Same goes for the Warmism.
Etc.

/Taro