Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TideGlider who wrote (794303)	7/9/2014 12:27:13 AM
From: joseffy	Respond to of 1579732

Photo: As Border is Overrun, Obama Drinks Beer, Plays Pool in Denver

To: TideGlider who wrote (794303)	7/9/2014 12:27:40 AM
From: joseffy	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Respond to of 1579732

Costco Karma: Dinesh D'Souza's 'America' Book Soars to Amazon #1 Shortly After Banishment

To: TideGlider who wrote (794303)	7/9/2014 12:30:15 AM
From: joseffy	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Respond to of 1579732

To: TideGlider who wrote (794303)	7/9/2014 12:40:46 AM
From: joseffy	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Respond to of 1579732

CO GOVERNOR, OTHER PROMINENT DEMS, WILL NOT ATTEND OBAMA'S DENVER SPEECH President Barack Obama will speak in Denver's Cheesman Park on July 9, and Senator Mark Udall (D-CO), Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper (D), and congressional candidate Andrew Romanoff (D-CO), will not be there. All three will be on the ballot this November and all three say "prior commitments" will prevent them from attending the event with Obama. According to The Denver Post, Udall, Hickenlooper, and Romanoff are all three "in the fight of their political careers." For example, Udall's pro-amnesty position is receiving more and more press with each passing day. And Hickenlooper's false statements on gun control, his fumbling of questions on gun control from Weld County Sheriff John Cooke, and his admission that he would sign gun control again if given the chance, sparked a firestorm in the media in early June. To be seen standing side-by-side in Denver with a pro-amnesty and pro-gun control President could be politically detrimental for these men. Thus CO Republican Chairman Ryan Call thinks Udall and Hickenlooper are "doing everything they can to run [from Obama]."

To: TideGlider who wrote (794303)	7/9/2014 10:22:28 AM
From: jlallen	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Respond to of 1579732

ted is impervious to facts....

To: TideGlider who wrote (794303)	7/10/2014 1:11:58 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1579732

I didn't trust Jlallen for the information. It is a fact that the same voters are logged as having voted in both primaries which is not legal in that state. Who told you? I am sure you have a link to confirm your position. Please provide. TIA. Now the only question is if someone else or some organization voted in a legitimate voter's name in a different primary. It isn't too difficult to grasp. First of all, its been 15 days since the election........what is McDaniels saying these days? Not much. By now a decent app could have figured out which Dems voted in both primaries. Oh wait...do they have computers or cell phones in MS? Even if they don't, the teapers could have checked manually by cross referencing the polls to see if there was a strong basis for their claims. So what have the teapers been saying? Not much. And lets not forget the teapers had poll watchers stationed at the polls to make sure poll workers were turning away those Dems who had voted in the Dem primary. So there's that. Besides this is the way MS rolls..........allegedly, even McDaniel has rolled that way in the past: Everyone knew before the election who was allowed to vote — basically anyone who did not vote in the Democratic primary a few weeks ago. This is longstanding practice; heck, McDaniel himself apparently voted in a Democratic primary in 2003. So the idea that the courts are going to come in and subtract an uncertain number of "illegal" Democratic votes cast presumably for Cochran seems most unlikely. But what's really hilarious about your's and jlallen's assertions...........most pol analysts think the basis for a McDaniels lawsuit won't be about the primary voting but by this crazy provision in MS voting law: ..........is citing MS Code § 23-15-575 (2013), which states: *No person shall be eligible to participate in any primary election unless he intends to support the nominations made in the primary in which he participates.* I guess that means we have to wait until November to see if the primary voters vote the 'right way' in the general election. And if they don't? Do they get a slap on their hands, or across their butts, or do they have to do 100 hail marys? Let me know what legal beagle jlallen says.