SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Lokness who wrote (255459)7/9/2014 11:04:53 AM
From: Steve Lokness  Respond to of 543045
 
Interesting Bill from Rand Paul and Booker. Looks to me the strategy is to go after the middle in what I think is a run for President by Paul.

washingtonpost.com


  • Encourage states to increase the age of criminal responsibility to 18-years-old, directing children away from adult criminal courts. Currently, some states still try 16- and 17-year-olds as adults by default.
  • Automatically expunge or seal records for juveniles who commit nonviolent crimes. Individuals would have their records of nonviolent juvenile offenses automatically expunged if they commit those crimes before they turn 15 and automatically sealed if they commit the crimes between the ages of 15 and 18.Restrict the use of solitary confinement for children.Offer the first broad-based federal path to sealing nonviolent criminal records for adults. Nonviolent offenders would be able to petition to have their records sealed, making it easier for them to reenter society. It would also improve the accuracy of FBI backgrounds when employers ask for such information, providing increased protection to job applicants.Restore access to government benefits for certain low-level drug offenders.



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (255459)7/9/2014 11:22:32 AM
From: Metacomet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543045
 
You and BUTW are so transparent you are laughable

A tag team that works non-stop to help us see the truth, such as posting a piece, that you, ahem, disagree with of course, entitled "The Myth of Income Inequality"...not that you personally agree with such nonsense, just sayin..

...and then we launch into the required allusions to Krugman, The Dolt, as everything you have ever posted inevitably does...usually with a Quixote-esque thrust at Keynes for good measure

..and this time for even more good measure, to really help us understand whatever the fuck you are selling, we dig up the non-event Solyndra..that gold plated right wing example of Obama's incompetence

Your posts are so formulaic they are actually boring



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (255459)7/9/2014 11:48:44 AM
From: Alex MG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 543045
 
what does Solyndra have to do with Krugman?

you do know that the Solyndra project was started under Bush don't you?

there are always going to be business failures in emerging industries

In Sylindras case almost nothing went to wages - I think it went to bond holders or money heaven...........

as usual you just like to pull shit straight out of your ass... you always seem to get into trouble when you "think"

The loan program started under President Bush From the San Jose Mercury News, October, 2008:

In late 2007, Solyndra was one of 16 clean-tech companies deemed eligible for $4 billion worth of loan guarantees from the U.S. Department of Energy. Tesla Motors, the Silicon Valley electric carmaker, and Oakland’s BrightSource Energy, a builder of solar-thermal plants, also made that list.

ourfuture.org
The Government Didn’t Lose

Even though Solyndra went into bankruptcy the government didn’t “lose.” The purpose of the government’s involvement was to help trigger the development of green-energy manufacturing in the United States, not to help individual companies. This was not a direct investment in a company with the expectation of a profit for the government. In the bigger picture of promoting American leadership in the emerging green-energy industry the government’s loan guarantee was a success. Even though Solyndra’s investors lost out our country retains the trained skilled employees, the intellectual property, the innovators funded, the suppliers, and the factory. As components of a national effort to trigger a key strategic industry, those are all still there and in the US.

It isn’t the government’s job to make sure the investors make money, the government’s job is to work to keep all of these components of an industry here and to grow new ones here, and this is what has been accomplished. When a VC makes an investment, a company failing just goes on the books as a loss. But our government has succeeded even if Solyndra’s investors lost money because the country as a whole benefits. All these employees are trained, all the researchers can take what they know to other solar companies, the IP is going to be sold — and it should be part of the conditions that it be sold to an American company. So while Solyndra’s for-profit investors lost money, America’s larger effort to nurture a solar-power industry continues toward its goal with assets enabled by this loan guarantee.