SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: clean86 who wrote (171840)7/18/2014 2:58:34 PM
From: Doren  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213177
 
Those are the obvious enticements but they haven't proven to be as compelling on pads.

Processors - meh... fast enough, efficient enough for most people

Better Camera - makes sense on a phone, for business purposes or pretty scenes or what ever, what are you going to do at home, take a picture of your kitchen?

Better screen - how many pixels do you need - maybe from the first low res pads

Larger Storage - again on a phone you need more music, take pictures - on a pad at home you already have huge amounts of storage on your computer. I'm assuming that people with pads usually have computers. My guess is over 90% have computers.

Battery? - not hard to charge at home

Not saying these are factors for everyone, just comparing them to how useful/necessary they are on a phone vs a pad.



To: clean86 who wrote (171840)7/18/2014 3:03:25 PM
From: Ryan Bartholomew  Respond to of 213177
 
Faster Processors, better Camera, better Screen, Fingerprint Sensor and larger Storage.
IME, many people are very satisfied with the iPad's camera, screen, battery life, etc. I don't hear many complaints... the device seems to be more than suitable for its intended uses. Make it so it can roll up into your pocket, take voice commands and dictation with extreme accuracy, or similar improvements and I could see it being a selling point, but core specs seem to already be quite sufficient for many.