Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TopCat who wrote (27252)	12/14/1997 6:10:00 PM
From: Pugs	Respond to of 55532

TC Exit strategy aside, The BIG SHORT, is the PAYOFF!!! When he covers, the war is won! ____________________________________________________________ >>>>>Subject: Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? \| Previous \| Next \| Respond \| Earnings \| You have 1 unread message To: Ivan L. (3255 ) From: NEIL MACK Thursday, Jun 5 1997 9:15PM EST Reply # of 7285 Ivan, What's this I hear....that the short boys are the real target of the SEC? No wonder you know "Larry" on first name basis Ivan. How many times were you deposed? Ivan, being on the front page of the WSJ must have bought you fame and fortune....or was it the drop from 200 to 40 or were you one of the shorts that were forced to cover at great loss on the way up, thereby losing out later on such a nice juicy gain? You are certainly aware that the drop of Presstek stock price was at least partially orchestrated by you and your short cronies, spreading false information and innuendo, creating gains at the expense of the little guy. It has been my research that shows the SEC was created to protect the average investor from tactics designed to manipulate the stock of a company. If anyone deserves being investigated, it is you and those like you that twist facts and spread false rumors for your own gains. Ivan, it sounds as if you must have lost a bundle as Pressek rocketed to 200. As so many of those presently short, shorted below 70, are you part of this group. Getting nervous aren't you Ivy my boy? Up another 2 or 3 points today aren't we? Certainly have made up the few points drop on Tuesday haven't we? I don't believe it will be so easy to take Presstek down this time Kookooka or whatever your alias is.... Larry will be watching you..... My advice is to answer....."no comment" when the WSJ comes calling again after PRST passes 100. AOL must be thrilled to know you used false identity to register with them after they gave you the boot....or have I got that all wrong? They forgave and forgot, Ivy???? Freedom of the press and all that? Well, you best behave yourself on SI...short a few thousand more at 93, and if you wish upon a star your dreams of Presstek crashing to smithereens may come true.....but only in your dreams Ivy boy. Neil PS...Ivy says....>"remember on this day a year-ago". Prst was $200. And, within an hour, it was $150. Within ten trading days, less than a hundred......within thirty days, less than $50." Ivan....get a calendar, check your dates and quit living in the past. Your losing all chance to be a wealthy man. __________________________________________________________Pugs

To: TopCat who wrote (27252)	12/14/1997 6:13:00 PM
From: Pugs	Respond to of 55532

>>>>>>You are certainly aware that the drop of Presstek stock price was at least partially orchestrated by you and your short cronies, spreading false information and innuendo, creating gains at the expense of the little guy. It has been my research that shows the SEC was created to protect the average investor from tactics designed to manipulate the stock of a company. If anyone deserves being investigated, it is you and those like you that twist facts and spread false rumors for your own gains.<<<<<<<<< Pugs