SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (256785)7/22/2014 12:33:00 PM
From: Alex MG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541916
 
these people are morally bankrupt...

But if you read the majority’s decision, you can see the two Republican judges positively luxuriating in the drafting error for page after page, exploring every possible way in which it could trap the government into denying subsidies to people.



To: JohnM who wrote (256785)7/22/2014 12:34:42 PM
From: neolib  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 541916
 
Why couldn't the author of that piece at least clarified whether the issue was taking away a monthly subsidy vs an annual tax credit? If it is only the former, then it doesn't change the annual cost of insurance at all, although it does change the monthly cash flow, which for many would be a burden. But as is typical for much of what passes as reporting these days, none of these articles seem to have a clue...


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News