To: shades who wrote (27280 ) 12/14/1997 10:11:00 PM From: Skeeter Bug Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
>>Why did mork send an employee here to bash the stock, do squeezes require fundamentals?<< have you listened to intel longs? they constantly talk a stock up. so what if mork talks a stock down. he's short. what do you expect? btw, how many longs talk rmil up? what disaster are they scared of? >>What leads to your ERROR in thinking that squeezes require fundamentals, do more people buy bottled water or zip drives?<< uf you are betting on a pure squeeze apart from fundamentals then, imho, you are very, very unwise. if it doesn't work you lose all or nearly all your dough. but hey, we're already 70% of the way there, aren't we? why? >>Yes, apparently you did.<< what did i miss? i kinow your down 70% in a few weeks. is there anything else i need to know? >>AHAHHA, THIS explains why you cannot understand a squeeze, they DO NOT REQUIRE fundamentals, you can short squeeze a stock that sells pet rocks, if there is an illegal naked short position, SIMPLE laws of suplly and demand, did you ever take an economics course?<< what short position? YOU CAN'T VERIFY IT. YOU ARE GUESSING BASED ON HEARSAY. even less wise, imho.THE REPORTED SHORT POSITION WAS 100K SHARES ABOUT 6 FREAKING MONTHS AGO. HE COULD HAVE COVERED 20 TIMES OVER. MAYBE 50 TIMES OVER. SO PROVE HE DIDN'T... >>Who controls the pricing friend, not the cartel, the mm's that have the most to lose if the squeeze happens.<< oh REALLY. THEN THEY CAN DRIVE IT TO $0.01 AND KEEP IT THERE, RIGHT? shades, occf was a short squeeze. float was 800k. stock went from $10 to $120 in about 4 months. i've been in a squeeze and this isn't one. you are quite confused who is getting squeezed. it is YOU. btw, when this bowser hits $0.10 or so, the shorts will REALLY BE SCARED THEN, HUH? ;-)