To: shades who wrote (27292 ) 12/14/1997 8:39:00 PM From: David R Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
RE You were WRONG weren't you? Actually, You used Tiawan as your source of clean water information, when I merely stated that Asia has an abundance of clean water suplies (i.e. remote mountain springs). I never said that Tiawan has plenty of sources of clean water. But when I mentioned tha the US has 10% of 10% of the Tiawanese bottled water market, you then point to the entire Asian market. Is it you assertion that there are no clean water sources (i.e. mountain springs, etc) in al of Asia, including Chine, Nepal, and Russia. Look at the CHART, which one would you pay more for? Depends, is more Magnesium worth the extra sodium? There are only 4 suppliers. Is it your assertion that RMIL has the best source of water in all of the US (or world for that matter).Why NOT? Who has the best product? The best product is not the question (again, you only provide 4 for comparison). The Sony Beta was a superior video tape format. the Mac was far better that dos/Windows. In this case, good water with a company that has very little working capitol is worse that a rich company with mediocre water (at least from a marketing perspective). Give sufficient resources, a good marketer could make eskimos desire cool refreshing ice.How can a MARKETER do THAT with MUNI WATER friend? You appear to be a little naive. Go to a local super market, and read the labels of some bottled water. I bet half the stuff on the shelves is little more that filtered muni water. Just read the fine print. But that is changing, I bet MANY have been educated here, You over estimate the general public. Few people take the time to consider the health implications of the food they eat. What makes you think water is any different. Did you know which one was better, public awareness is growing from this very BOARD Yea, I can tell the impact you guys are having. Do a web search on RMIL. Other than a few press releases, and SI, there is absolutely no interest in this company at all. 99.99% (an unsubstantiated guess) of the World has no idea that RMIL even exists. If all is as you say regarding the squeeze, what is the time frame you put on it happening. a week, a month, a year, 10 years. What metrics might one use to track RMIL and determine how the squeeze is playing out? We already know that a drop in price is good for the squeeze, as is a rise. High volume is good, as is low volume. Good publicity is good. Bad publicity is good also (just the MM's and shorts trying to pull RMIL down). Notice how no matter what happens, it is all good news for the cartel? You see, you have no assurance that you really do control as much of the company as you claim. If somebody was quietly selling shares into the market and increasing the float, how would you know? There is selling and buying every day. Are all those nasty MM's still selling naked shorts? You see, you only assume that everybody on this thread is honestly reporting their position (including one who claims to have mentally interfered with the Mars Lander). Lastly, I notice that you were not content with my silence. You had to repost the message. Out fishing today my friend?