Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (796733)	7/24/2014 3:10:25 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578705

I've always been curious as to why, if they want to use drugs to kill people, the state doesn't just use the drugs known to cause death by overdose, such as heroin and oxycontin. When junkies die from overdoses of these pain killing drugs, it's presumed they die a painless death. The states have vast quantities they've seized in drug raids, so the supply would be free of cost.

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (796733)	7/24/2014 6:04:34 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578705

That's not an explanation, of how life in prison for Bundy with all the benefits is just, fair, and resolute, its a dodge. Try again. I feel your pain. So explain to me how life in prison for guys like Ted Bundy represents a just, fair, and resolute outcome.

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (796733)	7/24/2014 6:32:43 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578705

"You didn't say if you would switch positions with Bundy for the great deal he is getting????" Wrong. I clearly stated, I would not give up my freedom for those benefits and I will add that I would not give up my freedom for any kind of benefits... difference between you and me. In any event the issue was not about benefits or lack thereof, it was a question of justice, which you've still been unable to explain or too afraid to explain.