Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (56292)	7/30/2014 8:27:27 PM
From: teevee	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 86363

No; we are responsible for 3% of the yearly production, but, since the cycle was in balance and atmospheric CO2 change was zero without us, we are responsible for 100% of the increase above pre-industrial levels. Wharfy, first, your comment about the cycle being in balance is yet more bs as historical CO2 fluctuations have been as low as near 100ppm to over 5000ppm. Second, 97% of the annual increase is natural, as reported by the EIA. Third, 97% of the 100ppm increase over the last 100years is natural and 3ppm may be due to humans burning fossil fuels. Fourth, you should stop visiting websites run by a failed cartoonist and pretender.