Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sepku who wrote (10888)	12/14/1997 11:51:00 PM
From: Helios	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

"I'm beginning to suspect that my procrastination may cost me the chance of establishing a short position at a decent altitude." If 'ifs' and 'buts' were candy and nuts we would all be happy at Christmas. I tried to goad you into it at 85.

To: sepku who wrote (10888)	12/15/1997 5:38:00 AM
From: Zoltan!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

>>Stratacom seems to have been a real hemmorhoid for CSCO since day 1 -- inflaming everyday. Too bad for CSCO that ASND snapped up CSCC before they could. CSCC was kicking Stratacom all over the place prior to either was aquired, and nothing's changed...except more orders going to CSCC. The only contract I've seen come out of Stratacom for a while now, is an ATM order out of Australia. exchange2000.com Ah, the playground that is your mind: You got everything wrong about why Cisco passed over Cascade in favor of now better performing Stratacom. ASND bought what was left. Cisco did, however, make a small windfall on its Cascade stock, unlike the Cascade owners that have been unfortunate enough to have held Ascend. They have been eviscerated. I'll bet they still pray Cisco had bought them instead of rejecting them. No wonder they call you Style Pts., that's a loser/consolation prize for the one without substance, the "real hemmorhoid" (to use your own misspelled words), the one incapable of scoring debating pts. Or do you just get your kicks by posting nonsense and seeing if fools concur? Regards