Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (56308)	7/31/2014 10:25:43 AM
From: teevee	1 Recommendation Recommended By russet Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 86363

LOL....having trouble spinning the fact that human made CO2 emissions are trivial and only account for 3% of annual increases?......I will go with the EIA government data: The contention made by HockeySchtick seems to be supported by old table from the Energy Information Administration which shows the same thing: only about 3% of atmospheric carbon dioxide is attributable to human sources. The numbers are from IPCC data. Look at the table and do the arithmetic: 23,100/793,100 = 0.029. URL for table: eia.doe.gov If one wanted to make fun of the alleged consensus of “climate scientists”, one could say that 97% of carbon dioxide molecules agree that global warming results from natural causes.