Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric who wrote (56362)	8/1/2014 8:37:15 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86363

With or without the H2CO3/HCO3?

To: Eric who wrote (56362)	8/2/2014 1:09:01 AM
From: Hawkmoon	1 Recommendation Recommended By Sdgla Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86363

You seem to be the expert. For one.. I've never claimed to be an "expert". That's for the scientists to perform experiments, and then present their finding and conclusions for critical analysis and scrutiny. I'm asking questions based upon what appears to be basic and implicit logic. And I'm critical of climate scientists who ignore such blatant influences and factors in their climate models.. Again, it's NOT like CO2 levels haven't been far higher than current day and there was NO human influence. Natural forces took place that we need to understand. And all that I'm trying to say is that we can't have a 40-50% decrease in Marine Algae and think there will be no impact upon atmospheric CO2 levels. And it needs to be researched and factored into global climate models. Secondly, the answer you're seeking would also depend upon the alkalinity of the water. And alkalinity of ocean water varies significantly around the globe. Which is also why I grow suspicious of "cherry-picking" data to "prove" ocean acidification by those asserting CC impacts on ocean temps and alkalinity. en.wikipedia.org Hawk