Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric who wrote (56384)	8/3/2014 3:05:04 PM
From: Hawkmoon	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86363

It has been and continues to be refined in subsequent models as more data comes in. It has? Even though the Secchi disk research only became available as a scientific paper in 2010? Can YOU show "proof" of that? All I ever hear regarding phytoplankton is that ocean "acidity" is a threat to their growth (and also certain Zooplankton). But I've NEVER seen any Climate research clearly showing that they have incorporated the effects of a 40% decline in Phytoplankton since 1950. Hell, the CC priesthood doesn't even want to acknowledge that the oceans are Iron deficient.. Every attempt to conduct Iron fertilization research is met with fear-mongering and denigrated as "geo-engineering" . So go ahead.. show me the proof that CC models have incorporated that 2010 Secchi disk data and "re-calibrated" their models going back 64 years. Hawk