Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (9971)	12/15/1997 12:45:00 AM
From: Alan Markoff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39621

From Nancy, Who is Dr. Benjamin Freedman? Surley you searched hard to find this vile material that matches your thinking.

To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (9971)	12/15/1997 1:15:00 AM
From: Jane Hafker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 39621

Well, Emile, now I wish you had done what I asked last week, to explain why the Talmud was supposedly evil. This does not exactly reflect the wholesome family value quality of elaborating on the basic law of Moses as suggested in the website. Again, I hope with all my heart you are not holding Nancy and Alan responsible for the Talmud. I doubt they have anything more to do with it than I do. But, I certainly share your views on the Talmud. It is akin to the Kabala, it doesn't point to occult arts and how to get power from the darkness like the other. What it appears to be is a Nazi document, reversing the name gentile for Jew. It seems to be paraphrased Hitler-speak. Anyway, I do apologize for implying that you were attacking a benign book of heritage. You know how I love truth and hate a lie. Again, Nancy and Alan are not Talmud scholars, and appear to know as much about it as I do. Nothing. I think if you will quit accusing them of being Talmudic scholars it will make all of us a lot happier. They are not. We know they are not, and continued attacks on them due to your justified hatred of the Talmud is not balanced or fair. I have had I don't know how many aetheists rail at me about the Crusades. The point? I am responsible for killing "innocent people" during the crusades. It is quirky and bizarrely funny, but highly, highly insane also, don't you agree?