Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (106936)	8/8/2014 1:03:27 PM
From: Metacomet	1 Recommendation Recommended By Hawkmoon Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 219733

There is more Thorium in the Earth's crust than Uranium Thorium reactors are able to incinerate the Plutonium waste, from existing reactors, that they can't figure out how to dispose of They cannot melt down ala Fukushima The reason that Uranium was chosen as the fuel of choice was the ability to produce weapons grade fissionable material as a by product That has turned out to be not such a good idea ..except that Uranium based operators are doing everything they can to prevent Thorium development as it puts their installed investment base at risk