SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (800736)8/10/2014 2:13:53 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1580020
 
It is really funny in a perverse sort of way.

You guys, claiming the Dome is too expensive or that it just doesn't work, are at the same time bitching about the "asymmetry" in the damage and injuries. Meanwhile, the Israeli people sure as hell look at the Dome as a modern-day miracle that saves lives and allows them to have at least some comfort in knowing the likelihood of these terrorist attacks failing.

Claims for damage compensation when contrasted with prior years is at 25% of those attacks, even though the number of rocket attacks is far greater. There is no question it works, and the savings from reduction of damage likely offsets the cost of the Iron Dome consumables.



To: combjelly who wrote (800736)8/10/2014 2:15:43 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1580020
 
Taking this into account, what the Pals are doing doesn't seem quite so stupid:

They might have overstated the cost differential. And we are paying for the rockets right now.

Does anyone know why their rockets are so inaccurate? They seem like teens playing with a chemistry set.