Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joan Osland Graffius who wrote (25262)	12/15/1997 9:13:00 AM
From: TREND1	Respond to of 53903

Joan Thanks for info I just woke up (g) Larry Dudash

To: Joan Osland Graffius who wrote (25262)	12/15/1997 9:14:00 AM
From: Mike V.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53903

I believe the $.06 forecast was for MUEI, not MU.

To: Joan Osland Graffius who wrote (25262)	12/15/1997 9:23:00 AM
From: Thomas G. Busillo	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 53903

Joan, thanks. I got up late. Nice to see CNBC giving such quality coverage to the stock they helped move to 60 <g> Actually, IMHO David Faber and Joe Kernan are great. It's Maria B. who dropped the story. When she was standing next to the MU post, Maria B. sure had a lot to report on MU. Now that they've moved the post - ZIPPO! Terrific journalism. A+. Stand still and let the story come to you via traders standing around a post and then basically ignore it after they move the post? Where was the coverage from CNBC as the quarterly estimate went from .33 to .06? Seriously? It didn't happen overnight, right? I wish I could review the CNBC tapes over the run from 16 5/8 to 60 and count the number of "positive mentions" per week courtesy of Maria B. and compare them to the number of "negative mentions" per week on the way to 22. Any guess which is greater? Good trading, Tom