Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (802572)	8/19/2014 11:05:27 AM
From: Brumar89	2 Recommendations Recommended By d[-_-]b FJB Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580128

So if shoots someone two times and they keep coming, the cop should holster his gun and let himself be attacked.

To: tejek who wrote (802572)	8/19/2014 11:08:05 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1580128

If he keeps coming after five shots, do you stop?

To: tejek who wrote (802572)	8/19/2014 1:07:52 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	2 Recommendations Recommended By THE WATSONYOUTH TideGlider Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1580128

Ted, So far, most of the evidence suggests the cop's life was not in danger. Your question was why Michael Brown had to be shot six times, which assumes you think one or two shots would have been OK. But if the cop's life was not in danger, then even one shot would be one too many. Bottom line is that you're moving the goalposts. IF the cop's life was in danger, then six shots was reasonable. Otherwise, no shots would have been. Tenchusatsu