Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (802702)	8/19/2014 1:28:05 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580148

Ted, You assume the cop was a solid, stable individual. Of course I'm assuming that. Your question was why six shots was necessary, not whether the cop was stable, or competent, or legitimately fearing for his own life. Because if the cop wasn't stable, or competent, or legitimately fearing for his own life, then the question of "six shots" is moot. Tenchusatsu

To: tejek who wrote (802702)	8/19/2014 1:29:31 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580148

RE: shooting your victim who is unarmed six times looks to be an excessive show of force and suggests an unstable cop who is freaking out. Really? I think it is you who is freaking out. Do you know the first 4 shots were in the arm?