SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : President Barack Obama -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RetiredNow who wrote (145295)8/24/2014 12:32:46 PM
From: tejek1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Metacomet

  Respond to of 149319
 
You want a comparison of Republican and Democratic economic policies at work? Well, there can be no sharper contrast than what is happening in Texas, a Republican state full of Republicans who unabashedly follow Republican economic policies. Now let's compare Republican Texan economic policies to Obama's economic policies in all the other states. How do they do in a head to head match? The chart says it all. Obama is a big loser and so are his Democratic economic policies, which are impoverishing the other 49 states. Texas is doing well, because they choose the lonelier, but more economically responsible path of economic independence from the Keynesian Socialists in the White House.

Its true that TX has seen significant employment growth during and since the recession. However, the TX 'miracle' isn't quite the miracle you all would have us believe. TX escaped the housing crash the rest of the country experienced because of laws it enacted after its last housing crash in the 1980s. It was the 1980s when TX had a nearly decade long recession due to its housing and oil crash that happened simultaneously. They learned from that disaster and changed their housing laws accordingly.

Secondly, TX, like most oil states, was cushioned during the recession by continued oil extraction. States like OK, TX, and ND were nearly booming while the rest of the country wallowed in a deep recession caused, in part, by the Republican Bush administration. Even traditional n'er do well, Pittsburgh, was experiencing some employment growth due to the nearby fracking that was happening. During the recession, TX benefited mightily from their oil employment growth.

Thirdly, TX grows by poaching industry from other states. JC Penny, American Airlines, Occidental Petroleum etc are all major TX employers poached from other states. Hell, last year, Perry was up here offering $$$ to WA state aerospace cos to try and get them to relocate to TX. Austin is a tech center but it mostly grows from having tech companies set up satellite operations. Its one home grown 'tech' company, Dell, is mostly a component manufacturer, not a tech company. And Austin is a liberal area, not a Republican one. Very little industry of note is founded and developed in TX. It mostly is 'encouraged' to come from other states.

And despite all this growth, TX continues to be mired in poverty:



In fact most of the southern, red, Republican states are mired in poverty. And they are at the bottom of the barrel when it comes to other important stats...........literacy, health, life longevity etc.

Excuse me, then, if I am not impressed with your Republican boasting........mainly because there is a peculiar odor to it.



To: RetiredNow who wrote (145295)8/26/2014 2:09:50 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 149319
 
Surging U.S. Stocks Echo Dot-Com Rally With Cheaper P/E

By Lu Wang and Oliver Renick Aug 25, 2014 9:00 PM PT



Aug. 25 (Bloomberg) –- OppenheimerFunds Senior Economist Brian Levitt, Brean Capital Head of Macro Strategy Peter Tchir and BofA Merrill Lynch Head of U.S. Rate Strategy Priya Misra discuss S&P 2000, the Fed and rate hikes. They speak on “Street Smart.” (Source: Bloomberg) Related

Every day, the American bull market looks more and more like the dot-com bubble of the late 1990s. Except when it comes to valuations.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (SPX) briefly jumped above 2,000 for the first time yesterday and the Nasdaq Composite Index is within 10 percent of a record reached in March 2000, a time when Pets.com Inc. was worth more than $150 million. Investors have seen annualized returns of 24.5 percent since March 2009, compared with 27.1 percent over an equal amount of days ending March 24, 2000, the peak of the Internet rally, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Stocks are catching up to the pace of more than a decade ago amid record profits, near-zero interest rates and economic growth that’s expected to accelerate. While the dot-com bubble peaked with the S&P 500 trading at close to 30 times annual earnings of its companies, the valuation is about 19 times now, data from S&P Dow Jones Indices show.

“We’re on the expensive side of fair value, but certainly not in the bubble place they were in the 2000 period or in a place that concerns us,” Ed Hyland, an Atlanta-based global investment specialist at JPMorgan Chase Private Bank, said in a phone interview. The firm oversees about $1 trillion. “There is potential for the market to go higher.”

The S&P 500 rallied as much as 0.7 percent yesterday to 2,001.95 before paring gains, pushed up by prospective corporate takeovers and speculation European economic stimulus will be increased. The Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index, known as the VIX, rose 2 percent to 11.70, rebounding from a five-week low.

IPO Flood Five years of gains have driven the S&P 500 up 195 percent, compared with a 236 percent advance over the comparable period ended in March 2000. With the Federal Reserve calling valuations in smaller biotechnology and social-media companies “stretched” and mega-deals resurfacing, concern that prices are too high is growing.

Over the past three years, investors have seen a flood of technology and Internet companies go public, including King Digital Entertainment Plc, Yelp Inc., and Twitter Inc. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., the Chinese e-commerce company, is working on an initial public offering that may be the biggest in U.S. history.

The dot-com bubble was marked by unprofitable Internet companies selling shares for the first time, such as Pets.com, which had a sock puppet mascot and raised $82.5 million in February 2000. The company has since gone out of business.

‘Upward Trend’ “At this point, what the market should be doing is debatable,” Brad McMillan, chief executive officer at Commonwealth Financial Network in San Diego, said by phone. His firm oversees about $86 billion. “Right now there’s a clear upward trend.”

This bull market has seen widespread gains across all kinds of companies, unlike the technology bubble when the best performance was concentrated in computer shares. The S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, which strips out biases related to market value, has risen an annualized 28 percent since 2009, almost double the return from the last half of the Internet bubble.

An average of 380 S&P 500 stocks have increased during each of the last five years, compared with 307 in the 1990s, data compiled by Bloomberg show. At the record yesterday, 48 stocks hit a 52-week high, compared with 27 at the peak in 2000.

Being Rational The “market is being rational, responding to improving domestic economic news, extraordinarily low interest rates, easy monetary policy and limited inflation,” Howard Ward, chief investment officer for growth equities at Rye, New York-based Gamco Investors Inc., which oversees about $47 billion, wrote in an e-mail. “The market’s valuation level is very defensible.”

Options traders are seeking protection against losses after the S&P 500 climbed about 8 percent this year and has gone without posting a decline of 10 percent since 2011.

About 2.2 bearish puts were owned for every call betting on gains in the benchmark equity gauge, near the highest ratio since October 2008, data compiled by Bloomberg show. Puts wagering on a slide to 1,950 by Sept. 20 had the biggest open interest.

Viewed as one long bull market beginning in October 1990, the dot-com bubble is much larger than the current rally. The S&P 500 climbed more than 400 percent over that stretch and the Nasdaq (CCMP) Composite Index increased 15-fold, producing annualized returns of more than 33 percent for almost 10 years.

The Nasdaq peaked at 5,048.62 March 10, 2000, and would have to rise more than 10 percent from its current level of 4,557.35 to surpass that record. Since stocks bottomed five years ago, the gauge’s best annual performance was in 2009, when it rose 44 percent. That’s about half its return in 1999.

“The underlying fundamentals justify the level of U.S. stocks,” Cameron Hinds, regional chief investment officer at Wells Fargo Bank NA in Lincoln, Nebraska, said in a phone interview. “We’re not at the same level of extremes as in 2000, when valuations were clearly excessive and were apparent not just in hindsight but at the time.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Lu Wang in New York at lwang8@bloomberg.net; Oliver Renick in New York at orenick2@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Lynn Thomasson at lthomasson@bloomberg.net Michael P. Regan, Emma O’Brien

bloomberg.com



To: RetiredNow who wrote (145295)8/26/2014 2:27:33 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 149319
 
French government falls after dispute over austerity

At a press conference where he announced he was “regaining his freedom,” Mr Montebourg blamed the “unprecedented crisis” in France and Europe on “wrong political choices” and said that “it is now established, known, understood and agreed that austerity policies have prolonged the economic crisis and the pointless suffering of the European population. Today, the whole world is begging us to stop these absurd austerity policies.These errors, this obstination and absurd stubborness has opened up questions and discord in many European countries.”

irishtimes.com



To: RetiredNow who wrote (145295)8/29/2014 5:54:05 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149319
 
Labor Day Weekend Gas Prices Lower Than Last Year