Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joan Osland Graffius who wrote (107197)	8/25/2014 1:21:00 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 217881

Thank you Joan, I understand that you more or less agree with those calculations. If so no accounting for the cost of capital locked into land is an incorrect approach, some one paid for the land, and that money instead of being invested in the land could have been invested in the stock market like in S&P contracts and then the question is which investment over the longer term provided better yield when a premium should be given for liquidity I do know that land prices over the last few years grew dramatically but so has the S&P Not everyone inherited agricultural land and therefore cost of land should be part of the calculation