To: bentway who wrote (803854 ) 8/26/2014 9:10:04 PM From: one_less Respond to of 1579980 Each person's account is questionable, but added together worth consideration. Dorian Johnson: Whatever Michael was up to (clearly no good) Dorian was in on it. His statement although not worthless is most likely to take the heat off himself and avoid any kind of recrimination from the thugs who wrote that public warning to snitches. Pharoah: Seems to have some idea of the number of shots and the event but obviously did not have facts otherwise. If Pharoah saw him die, his details should have been better. If the officer shot him while he was running their should be some blood evidence. Crenshaw's account comes close to Mitchell's. Tiffany Mitchell says the cop was trying to pull Michael into the car (through the window?). I don't know how she could distinguish between that and Michael assaulting the cop to get his gun. Otherwise, her version seems to be the one the media has endorsed. Unidentified LA woman: likely BS. Everyone is trying to get their mugs on camera, or their name in print. Claims about shots in the back, "could have missed." Yes that could have happened. And for those who, despite all the eyewitnesses, want to entertain fantasies that he was charging the policeman or some such, also note that he was shot 35 feet away from the patrol car; google 'Michael Brown 35 feet from patrol car' for umpteen references on this. It hasn't been disclosed how close the two men were to each other. The officer was in pursuit, and Michael could have turned on him as the officer claimed. The forensic evidence would have to show the distance decreasing and the latter shots would show movement in the direction of the officer, to lend any credence to the officer's story. And of course no ambulance called, leaving him lying in the street for 4 hours. He was dead and hopefully a thorough investigation was underway.