SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pugs who wrote (27503)12/15/1997 1:49:00 PM
From: Riley G  Respond to of 55532
 
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 09:17:30 -0500
Subject: Ovis Cartel

Riley, I appreciate very much that you have been gracious enough to post a couple e-mails to SI for me. Frankly, prior to OVIS, I felt no compulsion to join SI, and now I must wait two weeks to post there.

There have been some speculation on this and other threads that the Cartel is in some way illegally manipulating a price. I would like to dispel that rumor. Legislation under the Securities and Exchange Act was directed at Sindicates (not cartels). Their destructive practice was to accumulate based on insider information, shared through a network of good ol' boys that were privileged bankers, ceos and the like who withheld information from the public if it suited them in their accumulation phase, and then distributed into weak hands.

That illegal practice has nothing to do with grass roots enthusiasm for a stock, sharing of public information and opinion and certificate calling. Don't be so nervous people. The Ovis Cartel's actions are virtually the OPPOSITE of the actions of a syndicate. Can the paranoia. Every armchair lawyer in SI land wants to sound like a personal friend of the SEC.

I was looking for a historical precedent, and though I haven't compiled a massive list of successful squeezes, (no time) I like the example of Northern Pacific. Overvalued at 110, it shot up to one thousand dollars, a bears worst nightmare. What is most interesting, is that after the squeeze, it didn't tank back to or below it's pre-squeeze price, and didn't fall below three hundred. In terms of dollars per share this is a massive increase, in terms of percentage gain, it is only an extra thousand percent or so, oh well. Ovis is a different animal of course, actually more ripe for growth than an over valued large cap. Many would like to scoff Ovis faithfuls hopes of large gains, but they fail to realize that these situations are common in the generalities of remarkable companies. This is exactly how small companies become big companies. Watch it happen. Better yet, come on board.



To: Pugs who wrote (27503)12/15/1997 1:51:00 PM
From: Deeber  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
The fact that Riley has stated he has a group of investors, a "CARTEL" that is joining together to control the float of the stock is ILLEGAL. He does not say to buy/sell, just said that the is a group formed to control the stock. SOrry if I do not have the statute in front of me, but I have the info told to me by 2 Ph.D's and 2 Vice Presidents of Merrill Lynch.

Ryan



To: Pugs who wrote (27503)12/15/1997 1:54:00 PM
From: joseph krinsky  Respond to of 55532
 
pug, i got a call from the nasd office, they got my fax. there should not be that long of a wait for my certs, she said. there has been alot of other calls to this office, they dont say much while investion is going on, but she said they would not rule ot a large short,that would leed to a squeeze. it is comming, WE MUST CALL FOR OUR CERTS IN HAND VERY IMPORTANT. they will keep me informed. thankyou joey k...



To: Pugs who wrote (27503)12/15/1997 1:54:00 PM
From: Jack of All Trades  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 55532
 
Pugs,

This stock being in such "short" supply the MM's won't even grab it from me at 1 1/8???

JeffG



To: Pugs who wrote (27503)12/15/1997 7:49:00 PM
From: michael d kugler  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
Defy? You want a couple hundred posts?