Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus who wrote (107371)	8/31/2014 10:10:04 PM
From: TobagoJack	Respond to of 219928

you cannot be clear on hong kong because you do not know what the issues are so let me be clear the treaty between china & britain re hong kong was clear, 50-years no change no change means "no change" however hong kong's political and civil servant leadership were done is done and shall be done only that beijing replaces london the hubbub in the media concerns two groups of folks group 1 - occupy central (meaning shut cbd down to make some political gain) group 2 - anti-occupy central (meaning whatever politics maybe, do not shutdown cbd) the usual suspects of media makes it out to be group 1 - for democracy group 2 - against democracy even as both groups prefer hong kong select hong kong leadership hong kong does select hong kong leadership, except for the chief executive, who in the good old days were appointed by london, and in these wonderful days are appointed by beijing, all per 50-years "no change" was i clear enough?