Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Van Nguyen who wrote (2902)	12/15/1997 7:50:00 PM
From: Petz	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 6843

Van Nguyen, the table you posted shows the blatant pro-Intel bias of Business Week. Forutnately, any investor worth his salt knows that an endorsement from Business Week is the KISS OF DEATH, whether it be a company or the market in general. The cost of production of a K6-166 is no different than the cost of production of a K6-233 or a K6-200. Also, the cost of production of an Intel PENTIUM MMX, 233 MHZ is no different than the cost of production of the 166MHz MMX. The fact that business week chose to label the AMD rows "166 MHz" and the INTEL rows "233 MHz" shows that they were blatantly massaging the data to support their PRO-Intel story line and that their editors are too stupid to pick it up. Anyone who actually subscribes to this magazine should write a letter to the editor immediately. Petz