SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TideGlider who wrote (805390)9/5/2014 3:20:40 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1580039
 
TG,
I believe Obama wanted Assad out and radical Islam in. Just like Libya.
I don't believe Obama explicitly wants radical Islam to be in.

But I do think his populist beliefs, which have largely been shaped over the years as a "community organizer," biases him toward the groups that tend to side with radical Islam.

Obama will prove to be the Neville Chamberlain of the 21st century.

Tenchusatsu



To: TideGlider who wrote (805390)9/5/2014 3:24:12 PM
From: Tenchusatsu1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580039
 
TG, by the way, I just did a search, and I came across this gem, which confirms my analogy between Obama and Chamberlain:

Obama: 'Peace in Our Time'

The phrase appeared in a passage on foreign policy, in which the president pledged to defend the nation while resolving differences peacefully [emphasis added]:

And we must be a source of hope to the poor, the sick, the marginalized, the victims of prejudice--not out of mere charity, but because peace in our time requires the constant advance of those principles that our common creed describes: tolerance and opportunity; human dignity and justice.

The sentence is rather tortured, but the idea seems to be that promoting socioeconomic equality around the world can help prevent conflict. It echoes the “root causes” theory of terrorism, which is that poverty produces extremism or at least provides it fertile ground There is some truth to that, although many terrorists come from middle class origins, and target America precisely because it symbolizes the values the president described.

Regardless, the reason Chamberlain’s “peace in our time” is remembered is not that his theory of international relations was wrong but because he was hopelessly, dangerously naïve about Hitler’s intentions. A year after Chamberlain waved the paper on which he had signed the Munich Agreement, ceding the sovereignty of Czechosolvakia in return for Hitler’s promises of peace, Germany had invaded Poland and Britain was at war.