Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Menzies who wrote (2029)	12/15/1997 6:20:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Respond to of 3744

I will accept nationalization at 2.50 an issue. You are sadly right about Canada. North of the Albany River even in Matachewan, many parts of Ontario, Labrador, the NWT, BC, Saskatchewan are no places to start a mine. Geddes Resources, Cogema, Land claims settlement.. it's endless uncertainty and the Feds have fed that vision for the mine bashers for the last 30 years as they view mine development as a neandrathal process. It's time we out-lawed layers in the commons and provincial legislatures as they did in England for 1000 years. Every case is on its own merits. It appears that mining has no merit except if it's owned by the "right" people. I wonder if there is really any such thing as free enterprise anywhere. echarter@vianet.on.ca