SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (805964)9/10/2014 12:47:11 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1580154
 
There was "no evidence - literally, none at all" that al Qaeda was in the country planning to fly airliners into the WTC.
Wrong. There was quite a bit, but from different agencies. Had the FBI, the CIA and the NSA been talking to each other during the Bush admin., it probably wouldn't have been successful. But, The Bush admin. thought worrying about terrorists striking the US was a Clinton admin. obsession, early on.

They even ignored this PDB:
AQ determined to strike targets in the US



To: i-node who wrote (805964)9/10/2014 6:25:38 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580154
 
>> As we discussed when Perry first broached the subject, there’s no evidence – literally, none at all – of ISIS terrorists entering the United States through the southern border with Mexico. In fact, there’s no evidence of ISIS terrorists even trying.

There was "no evidence - literally, none at all" that al Qaeda was in the country planning to fly airliners into the WTC.


BS. There was evidence that al Qaeda was in the US, planning something.........the Germans warned the Bush administration. And we knew al Qaida was in the US ten years earlier when they first bombed the WTC. ISIS is not nearly as sophisticated as ISIS.

So stop freaking out!