SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (172426)9/10/2014 3:03:28 PM
From: jlallen3 Recommendations

Recommended By
locogringo
Sedohr Nod
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224759
 
Nonsense...your source was Huffington Post....and I don't read anything from those whacko lefty hate sites....



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (172426)9/10/2014 3:16:27 PM
From: locogringo1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Honey_Bee

  Respond to of 224759
 
Of course the cost of employer premiums have gone down, and the spending by payers has decreased.

Are you just dumb or are you on drugs?

The employees were dumped into obamacare and now have to pay the premiums, not the employers.

Ask JL for costs in his family alone if you dare to get TRUTH and FACTS to mix with your bullsh*t.

You are right about one thing, obamacare is here to stay, now that the employers have received this windfall in profits.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (172426)9/10/2014 3:23:01 PM
From: locogringo4 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
Honey_Bee
joefromspringfield
tonto

  Respond to of 224759
 

Healthcare Expert: Obamacare's 'Quiet Summer' is About to End in a Big Way

Dan wrote up yesterday's Washington Post/ABC News poll, which was jammed with crooked numbers for President Obama. Most striking was the (30/55) majority deeming Obama's presidency "a failure," along with the prevailing opinion that he's divided the country, and his unsightly leadership score. The survey also included a dreadful (38/56) presidential approval rating on the implementation of Obamacare; support for the law itself was also underwater, with an outright majority opposed, despite this polling series' silly question wording that omits any mention of 'Obamacare' or the 'Affordable Care Act.' A new Kaiser Family Foundation poll produces similar findings, with support for the president's signature domestic accomplishment swamped by opposition. It's been this way for years, across hundreds of national surveys.

One major reason for the enduring opposition is that the law has violated virtually every major promise erected in dishonest ideologues' sales pitch. Another is that an ongoing parade of unpleasant developments continues to make headlines, including the recent revelation that Healthcare.gov was hacked last month. Apologists can cherry-pick useful data points to try to convince the public that Obamacare is reducing premium costs and driving down costs, but that's simply not the case. Individual market premiums exploded in 2014, and are expected to grow by roughly eight percent in 2015 (with many consumers confronting double-digit spikes) -- to say nothing of high out-of-pocket costs and narrow coverage networks. Overall health spending continues an upward climb. The law was billed as a dramatic premium reducer that would also bend down the so-called "cost curve." Healthcare industry expert Bob Laszewski is out with a must-read post on next steps for Obamacare. He argues that the law may have been largely out of the news for the last few months, but a fresh round of cancellations and the coming open enrollment period are about to change all that:




To say this fall's 2015 Obamacare open-enrollment has the potential to be problematic is an understatement. The HealthCare.gov backroom is not built yet––a year and counting after it should have been. How many people are enrolled in Obamacare? Without a government to insurance company accounting system yet built, no one knows. While the open-enrollment is now scheduled to begin until 11 days after the November election there will be plenty of renewal and cancellation letters going out in October––not the least will be more pre-Obamacare policies being cancelled this year now that their one-year extension is up––carriers aren't necessarily allowing policies to be extended further...Does this all sound confusing? Just wait until we approach the next open-enrollment with millions of people hearing about all of this complexity and having just four weeks to get their enrollment validated for January 1. The Obamacare anxiety index is going to be off the charts well before November 15th. Add to all of this bigger deductibles for 2015 (those go up with cost trend as well as the rates) and more narrow networks as well as generally larger rate increases for the plans that got the most enrollment and there will be lots to talk about...The last couple of months have been very quiet for Obamacare. That is about to end.

Click through for a thorough debunking of recent pro-Obamacare spin on "baseline plan" premiums, as well as a reminder that many new Obamacare consumers -- a significant percentage of whom have dumped their coverage -- will have to either change their plans again for face much higher rates next year. More upheaval is on the way. Numerous polls have consistently found that roughly twice as many Americans say they've been personally hurt by Obamacare than helped. Most consumers, however, have responded that they haven't been impacted one way or another. That, too, will be changing for millions in the coming months and years. The Washington Post reports:

Large businesses expect to pay between 4 and 5 percent more for health-care benefits for their employees in 2015 after making adjustments to their plans, according to employer surveys conducted this summer. Few employers plan to stop providing benefits with the advent of federal health insurance mandates, as some once feared, but a third say they are considering cutting or reducing subsidies for employee family members, and the data suggest that employees are paying more each year in out-of-pocket health care expenses. The figures come from separate electronic surveys given to thousands of mid- to large-size firms across the country by Towers Watson, the National Business Group on Health and PriceWaterhouseCoopers, consulting groups that engage with businesses on health insurance issues. Bracing themselves for an excise tax on high-cost plans coming in 2018 under the Affordable Care Act, 81 percent of employers surveyed by Towers Watson said they plan to moderately or significantly alter health-care benefits to reduce their costs.

Higher costs and reduced benefits are on the way for many who are among the the large majority of Americans receiving health coverage through their employers. And I'll once again direct your attention to this news package, which quotes a prominent Obamacare designer and supporter cheerfully predicting that 80 percent of employer-based plans will "disappear" within the next ten years:




An independent study cited in the piece projects that number at 90 percent. The White House knew this was coming, and Senate Democrats voted down a Republican effort to reinforce the president's "keep your plan" promise, which continue crashing down around consumers for years to come. Bottom line: Think the Obamacare mess is in the rear-view mirror, or that you've escaped its impact? Just wait. I'll leave you with one additional polling point:

New: WSJ/NBC polls shows Americans still aren't sold on Affordable Care Act, with 34% in favor and 48% against. t.co

— Capital Journal (@WSJPolitics) September 9, 2014http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2014/09/10/obamacare-still-unpopular-set-to-impact-more-americans-n1889347



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (172426)9/10/2014 3:26:18 PM
From: locogringo4 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
joefromspringfield
R2O
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224759
 
Oh, you like Kaiser polls? Why didn't you say so?

Kaiser Health Tracking Poll: August-September 2014

The latest Kaiser Health Tracking Poll finds that public opinion on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) remains more negative than positive, with 47 percent viewing the law unfavorably (closer to levels measured earlier this year after rising to 53 percent in July) and 35 percent having a favorable view. Partisan divisions on the law are as deep as ever, not only when it comes to overall opinion but also in the public’s perception of how the law has impacted their own families and the next steps they want Congress to take.
This poll takes a special look at registered voters’ views of the ACA and what role, if any, the law might be playing in the upcoming midterm election. The survey finds that health care is named as an important voting issue by about one in eight voters, ranking behind the economy and jobs, and clustered with several other issues such as foreign policy and national defense, dissatisfaction with government, immigration, and education. At the same time, the ACA is prominent among the issues voters report hearing about from candidates in their campaigns and advertising. And the messages they are hearing in political advertising are decidedly more anti-ACA than pro-ACA, particularly in states with competitive Senate races. This messaging in advertising may be a reflection of Republican candidates playing to their base, as the survey finds that most Republican voters want candidates to continue talking about the ACA, while most Democrats want them to focus on other issues. Two months out from Election Day, Republicans have a modest edge among the most enthusiastic voters. However, it does not appear that opposition to the ACA is a big driver of that enthusiasm, as these voters are no more likely than others to mention health care as an important factor in their vote.




More Continue to View ACA Unfavorably than Favorably The latest Kaiser Health Tracking Poll finds that the public continues to be more likely to express an unfavorable view of the health care law (47 percent) than a favorable one (35 percent). However, after rising to 53 percent in July, the latest poll finds that the share with an unfavorable view fell back down closer to the shares reported earlier in the year. The share not offering an opinion on the law increased to 19 percent this month, while the share with a favorable view remains similar to previous levels. Even as overall opinion remains more negative than positive, nearly twice as many Americans say they want their Congressional representative to work to improve the law (63 percent) rather than to repeal it and replace it with something else (33 percent).


Figure 1

When it comes to personal impact, a majority of the public (56 percent) says the law has not directly impacted them or their families. Of those who say the law has touched them directly, about twice as many report being hurt (27 percent) as report being helped (14 percent). Those who report being hurt by the law mainly say that it has increased the cost of their health care or insurance (16 percent), while those who say the law has helped them mainly say it has allowed someone in their family to get or keep health coverage (6 percent) or made it easier for them to get the health care they need (4 percent).

Party Identification Sharply Divides Opinion Of Health Care Law Consistent with previous Kaiser Health Tracking Polls, opinions of the health care law including views overall, impression of personal impact and what Congress should do next are sharply divided along party lines. A majority of Democrats report a favorable opinion of the law (57 percent), while a majority of Republicans report an unfavorable opinion (74 percent), and independents fall in between the two, although more of them have an unfavorable than a favorable view (49 percent versus 30 percent). Intensity in opinion of the law lies with the Republicans, with about twice as many Republicans expressing a “very” unfavorable opinion of the law as Democrats expressing a “very” favorable opinion (57 percent versus 28 percent).


Figure 2

Just as opinion of the law in general is divided along party lines, reported personal impact is as well. Democrats (27 percent) are more likely than independents (11 percent) and Republicans (2 percent) to report that the law has directly helped them. And vice versa, Republicans are more likely to say that the law has directly hurt them (46 percent) than are independents (31 percent) and Democrats (10 percent).


Figure 3

The public’s preferences for next steps with the health care law also differ sharply by party identification, with a large majority of Democrats wanting their representative in Congress to work to improve the law (89 percent), and a majority of Republicans wanting them to work to repeal the law and replace it with something else (61 percent). However, notable shares of both Republicans (35 percent) and those with an unfavorable opinion of the law (40 percent) say that they want their representative to work to improve the law.


Figure 4

Where Does Health Care Rank As A Voting Issue? This month’s poll takes a special look at registered voters’ views of the ACA and what role, if any, the law might be playing in the upcoming midterm election. Like the public overall, registered voters are more likely to have an unfavorable view of the ACA than a favorable one (49 percent versus 35 percent). Opinion tilts even more negative among likely voters1 (51 percent versus 35 percent).

However, health care does not appear to be the dominant issue on voters’ minds when thinking about how to vote in November. Asked to name in their own words the two most important issues in deciding their vote for Congress, the most frequently-mentioned issue is the economy and jobs (21 percent). Thirteen percent of voters name health care as a top issue, including just 3 percent who specifically mention the Affordable Care Act. Those who view the law favorably are about equally likely to mention health care as a top issue in their vote as are those with an unfavorable view (12 percent versus 15 percent).

As a voting issue, health care is clustered with a number of other issues, including foreign policy/national defense/terrorism (13 percent), dissatisfaction with the way government is working (12 percent), immigration and border security (9 percent), and education (9 percent).


Figure 5

Looking at registered voters by party identification, the economy is the most frequently mentioned voting issue among Democrats, Republicans, and independents alike. While health care ranks second and is mentioned by a similar share of Democrats (15 percent) and Republicans (16 percent), it ranks further down the list and is mentioned by a smaller share of independent voters (9 percent). When Republicans mention health care as a top voting issue, they are more likely to mention the ACA or Obamacare by name (7 percent of Republicans versus 2 percent of Democrats), while Democrats are more apt to name other health care issues or health care more generally.

Other partisan differences are also apparent. For example, foreign policy, immigration, and government spending all receive more mentions among independents and Republicans than among Democrats, while Democrats and independents are more likely than Republicans to name dissatisfaction with government. Two issues make the top five list for Democrats but do not rank as high for other voters: education and crime/public safety.


Figure 6

Issues Are Only One Part Of Voters’ Decisions In assessing how the health care law will influence voting decisions, it’s important to keep in mind that national issues like the ACA are only one part of the calculus for voters. While about a third (34 percent) of registered voters say specific national issues will make the biggest difference in how they vote for Congress, about a quarter each say their vote will be mostly based on the candidate’s character and experience (23 percent) or local or state issues (24 percent), and 11 percent say the candidate’s party affiliation will be the most important factor.


Figure 7

Voters Are Hearing Candidates Talk About Jobs, Immigration, And The ACA While the ACA may not be top-of-mind for most voters when deciding how to vote, it is prominent among the issues voters report hearing about from candidates. About a third (32 percent) of registered voters say they’ve heard “a lot” from candidates about the health care law, and another one in five (19 percent) say they’ve heard “some” about the issue. Similar shares report hearing from candidates about immigration and the economy, while fewer say they’re hearing from candidates about education or state and local issues.

Voters who identify as Republican are somewhat more likely than Democratic voters to say they’re hearing “a lot” from candidates about immigration (41 percent versus 31 percent) and state and local issues (26 percent versus 17 percent), but for other issues, including the health care law, there is no partisan difference in how much voters report hearing from candidates.


Figure 8

Voters Report Seeing More Anti-ACA Than Pro-ACA Advertising In addition to hearing candidates talk about the ACA, about half of voters (53 percent) report seeing some type of political or issue advertising related to the health care law in the past 30 days, including ads that were opposed to or in support of the law itself, as well as ads that tried to influence their vote for a particular candidate because of their position on the law. Overall, nearly three times as many voters say that most of the ads they saw were opposed to the law (20 percent) as say most of them were in support of the law (7 percent), while just under a quarter (23 percent) say they saw about equal numbers of both.


Figure 9

In states with competitive Senate races2, an even larger share of voters reports seeing ads related to the law (71 percent), and the balance of negative over positive ads is even more lopsided (34 percent say they saw more ads opposed to the law while just 4 percent report seeing more ads in support).


Figure 10

Voters Are Divided On Whether Candidates Should Continue Talking About ACA At this point in the campaign, voters are evenly divided on whether they want to hear candidates for Congress continue to talk about the ACA. About half (48 percent) of voters say they are tired of hearing candidates talk about the law and would rather they focus on other issues, while a similar share (47 percent) feel it’s important for candidates to continue the debate. The desire for continued debate is more on the side of the law’s opponents than its supporters; about six in ten Republicans and those with an unfavorable view of the law want candidates to keep up the debate, while similarly large shares of Democrats and those who view the law favorably say they should move on to other issues.

Despite the fact that voters in states with competitive Senate races report seeing more campaign advertising related to the law, they are not more likely than voters in other states to say they are tired of hearing candidates talk about the ACA (49 percent in states with competitive Senate races versus 48 percent in other states).


Figure 11

Republicans Have An Edge Among “Enthusiastic” Voters, But Not Necessarily Because Of ACA As other polls have shown, Republicans have a modest edge when it comes to voter enthusiasm. While a majority of voters of all political stripes say their enthusiasm about voting this year is “about the same” as in previous Congressional elections, 27 percent of Republicans say they are “more enthusiastic” about voting this year than in the past, compared with 20 percent of Democrats and 18 percent of independents.


Figure 12

Overall, the survey finds that registered voters are fairly evenly divided between those who want to see the Democrats hold on to their majority in the Senate (43 percent) and those who would prefer to see the Republicans gain the majority (40 percent). This narrows to a dead heat among likely voters – 43 percent say they want a Democratic majority and 43 percent want a Republican one. However, Republicans have an edge among those who say they’re more enthusiastic about voting this year; half (50 percent) of these voters say they’d prefer to see the Republicans gain the majority in the Senate and 38 percent say they’d like the Democrats to hold on to their majority.

While the “more enthusiastic” voters may give Republicans an edge, opposition to the ACA does not seem to be the dominant factor driving their enthusiasm. These voters are no more likely than other voters to name health care as one of the most important issues in deciding their vote (14 percent name health care – including 6 percent who name the ACA specifically, ranking behind the economy at 21 percent and foreign policy/defense at 16 percent). Further, when asked to say in their own words why they’re more enthusiastic about voting this year, the most common responses relate to a desire to elect more Republicans or help Republicans gain control of the Senate (13 percent), followed by a general sense that participation is important (10 percent), a desire to change who’s in office or get rid of incumbents (10 percent), a general desire for change (8 percent), dissatisfaction with the way government is working (8 percent), and the overall direction of the country (8 percent). Just 3 percent of “more enthusiastic” voters mention the health care law as the main reason for their enthusiasm.


Figure 13

How Do Voters Say A Candidate’s Position On The ACA Will Affect Their Vote? While the ACA may be just one factor in voters’ decisions, many say that a candidate’s position on the law – along with a variety of other issues – would make them more or less likely to vote for that candidate. Almost four in ten (38 percent) say that if a candidate voted for the health care law, they would be less likely to vote for that candidate, while 29 percent say they would be more likely to vote for them. The numbers are almost exactly opposite when it comes to a candidate who voted to repeal the law: 41 percent say they would be more likely to vote for that candidate and 30 percent say they would be less likely to vote for them. To put the ACA in context with other issues, nearly half (48 percent) of voters say they’d be more likely to vote for a candidate who supports increasing the minimum wage, and over four in ten (44 percent) say they’d be less likely to vote for a candidate who supports a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.


Figure 14

Not surprisingly, voters’ reactions to different candidate positions on the ACA divide sharply on party lines, and once again Republicans appear to have the edge in terms of enthusiasm. Just over half (53 percent) of Democrats say they would be more likely to support a candidate who voted for the ACA, but an even larger share of Republicans (72 percent) say they would be less likely to back such a candidate. Similarly, when asked how they would react to a candidate who voted to repeal the law, 68 percent of Republicans say they would be more likely to vote for them and 53 percent of Democrats say they would be less likely.


Figure 15

Among independent voters overall, about twice as many say they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who voted for the ACA as say they would be more likely to vote for such a candidate (40 percent versus 21 percent). But as previous Kaiser tracking polls have shown, independents who lean towards one party or another have views that look more like their partisan counterparts. Nearly half (46 percent) of independent voters who lean toward the Democratic party say they would be more likely to support a candidate who voted for the health care law, while two-thirds (67 percent) of Republican-leaning independents say they would be less likely to support such a candidate.


Figure 16

As other polls have shown, voters’ views on the ACA, nicknamed “Obamacare” for the president who championed its passage and signed it into law, often mirror their views on the president himself. And in fact, this survey finds that partisan divisions in voters’ reactions to a candidate who “supports President Obama” are very similar to a candidate who “voted for the health care law.” Just over half (52 percent) of Democratic voters say they’d be more likely to vote for a candidate who supports the president (almost identical to the 53 percent who say the same about a candidate who voted for the ACA), and 82 percent of Republican voters say they’d be less likely to vote for such a candidate (similar to the 72 percent who say they’d be less inclined to back a candidate who voted for the ACA).


Figure 17




To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (172426)9/10/2014 4:50:50 PM
From: lorne3 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
locogringo
Sedohr Nod

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224759
 
US Casualty Rate In Afghanistan Under Obama Increases 500%, Yet No Antiwar Protests. Why?

NTEB News Desk
June 23, 2011
nowtheendbegins.com



So where is Code Pink?

Remember all the Liberal antiwar protesters who camped out in front of Bush’s ranch in Crawford, TX? They stayed there for well over a year, made all the headlines, and demanded that our troops be brought home. Seemed like a worthy cause, right? So, now that the US death toll in Afghanistan has increased 500% under Obama, I have yet to hear one, single word of protest, not to mention our current illegal war in Libya. Seems like Code Pink was not antiwar war death, they were only anti-Bush.

Remember these people who dogged Bush's every waking moment? Not a peep out of them since Obama took over and raised the casualty rate by 500%

“The average monthly casualty rate for U.S. military forces serving in Afghanistan has increased 5-fold since President Barack Obama was inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2009.

1,540 U.S. troops have been killed in Afghanistan since Oct. 7, 2001, when U.S. forces began fighting in that country to oust the Taliban regime that had been harboring al Qaeda and to track down and capture or kill al Qaeda terrorists.

During the Bush presidency, which ended on Jan. 20, 2009 with the inauguration of President Obama, U.S. troops were present in Afghanistan for 87.4 months and suffered 570 casualties—a rate of 6.5 deaths per month.During the Obama presidency, through today, U.S. troops have been present in Afghanistan for 29.1 months and have suffered 970 casualties—a rate of 33.3 deaths per month.

The 970 U.S. casualties that have occurred while President Obama has been commander in chief equal 63 percent–or almost two-thirds—of all U.S. casualties that have taken place in the nearly-ten-year-long war.

889 of the 970 U.S. casualties in Afghanistan that have occurred during the Obama presidency—or about 92 percent—have been combat-related casualties. During Obama’s presidency, U.S. troops have given their lives in the service of their country in Afghanistan at an average rate of more than one per day.” source – CNS News



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (172426)9/10/2014 4:57:06 PM
From: lorne1 Recommendation

Recommended By
locogringo

  Respond to of 224759
 
57 Percent of All U.S. Military Deaths in Afghanistan Happened Under Obama’s Leadership—In Only 2 1/2 Years and Counting!
doctorbulldog.wordpress.com

Here’s how I arrived at that figure:

U.S. Death Toll in Afghanistan under Bush (October 2001 to January 31, 2009 (Yes, I’m giving Obama the benefit of the doubt)) = 645

(source: www.icasualties.org)

Total U.S. Death Toll in Afghanistan as of June 2, 2011 = 1491

(source: www.defense.gov)

1491 – 645 = 846

Therefore:

U.S. Death Toll in Afghanistan under Obama as of June 2, 2011 = 846

(846/1491)*100 = 56.74 (rounded down)

Rounding up, we get 57 percent!

Folks, if this statistic were touted on the evening news every single night, Obama would be a goner! That’s why the Lame Stream Media has hit the mute button.

Time to publicize the fact that in only 2 1/2 short years, Obama’s Kumbayah Kinetic Warfare policies have killed more U.S. servicemen in Afghanistan than Bush ever did in his entire 8 years in office!—56.7 percent more, to be more precise!

How’s all that Hope and Change working for ya’?

Afghan Death Toll Rises; Media Interest Declines

Joseph Klein – FrontPage

The war in Afghanistan gets little attention by the mainstream media these days. But the loss of American lives continues to mount. Just last week, seven U.S. troops were killed by a powerful bomb which had exploded in a field where they were patrolling on foot. At least twenty-eight Americans have been killed in May, 2011 alone, according to the Associated Press.

To date, the Department of Defense has identified 1582 American service members who have died as part of the Afghanistan war and related operations, the majority of whom were killed since President Obama took office. During the Obama administration, more American service members have died in Afghanistan than during all the prior years since the Afghanistan war began in 2001.

For the U.S. military, 2010 was the deadliest year of the Afghanistan war so far. 499 service members died. Additionally, there were 5,182 US forces wounded in 2010. This represents more than half of all U.S. forces wounded in the entire Afghanistan war, which totaled 9,957 at the end of 2010.

The total U.S. military deaths compiled by the Defense Department for Operation Enduring Freedom for the years 2001 through 2010 are as follows:



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (172426)9/10/2014 5:06:17 PM
From: locogringo2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
isopatch

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224759
 
Here's another poll that you will love to read:

Poll Offers Brutal News for Obama, Democrats

weeklystandard.com