Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (806331)	9/12/2014 1:31:24 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 1584441

CJ, so Brown's family and attorney ordered an autopsy in order to get someone, anyone, to testify that Brown was shot in the back. And all they could get from that autopsy was "he and Dr. Baden could not determine conclusively the trajectories of the bullets that hit Brown—or which direction he was moving—when he was shot." Meanwhile, the credentials of Prof. Parcells is being challenged: fox4kc.com Looks like Parcells isn't a licensed pathologist. Let's face it. There's a mountain of evidence suggesting that Brown was approaching the officer in a threatening way when he was shot, and that Brown had reason to given that he robbed a convenience store. There is scant evidence that Brown was shot in the back or shot while he threw his hands up in surrender. Tenchusatsu