Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Cartaway resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Pakstas who wrote (1272)	12/15/1997 5:47:00 PM
From: Buckey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2505

ED; does the following statement fall within the realm of a "Massive Sulphide" "The best intercept was a massive sulphide lense from 664.95 to 666.53m which returned 0.10% Co, 0.32% Cu and 0.24% Ni, grades there are similar to those encountered in massive sulphide lenses in the bottom of hole LBN-4 and located some 300m above the intercepts in LBN-11" The numbers look low. Will the share price be. I am no geologist but nothing over 0.58%..

To: Ed Pakstas who wrote (1272)	12/15/1997 6:17:00 PM
From: Mr Metals	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2505

Ed There's more minerals in a can of Brewers Yeast then in their results. Cheers, Mr Metals

To: Ed Pakstas who wrote (1272)	12/15/1997 11:35:00 PM
From: R.A.K.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2505

Does anyone happen to know how many holes in total CWA has drilled this year? Compared to Donner's 40 holes totalling 12'419 meters CWA's 5 holes totalling 592.37 meters seems like there's still lot's of work left to be done. It doesn't seem like CWA is going as deep as DML even though the deeper DML was going the better the grades they encountered. Also is it not possible that with the end of the year events taking place, that this news has of been put out not to drive the price down but, to keep it down so that the "powers that be" can use the next couple of months to position themselves before they start announcing the plans for the spring of '98. It seems to me that they could of had this news available for sometime and the timing of this release is a little odd. Just my views on things take it for what it's worth but something doesn't sit right with me on this one. Anyways once bitten twice shy I guess??? Tomorrows always another day!!! Regards, RAK